首页> 外文期刊>Natural hazards and earth system sciences >Disasters: Contributions of hazardscape and gaps in response practices
【24h】

Disasters: Contributions of hazardscape and gaps in response practices

机译:灾害:危害景观的贡献和应对措施的差距

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Disasters are frequent, ongoing and very likely to increase in the future with global climate change. Significant investments in hazard mitigation, policies and emergency management have so far failed to stop disasters. Their recurrences suggest that either there are some gaps in the current response or a different perspective is needed on the way hazards have been dealt with to date. This paper views disasters through the lens of hazardscape, which shows the context of both hazard occurrence and response. It finds that one major cause of response failure is inadequate consideration of the local hazardscape in planning. It notes that although globalization of hazard response practices is progressive, it has been less successful in dealing with local variations in vulnerability. This paper presents the conceptual framework of hazardscape, and illustrates various shortcomings of the current responses in relation to the local hazardscapes where they are adopted. It recommends a holistic approach that considers various aspect of the hazardscape in order to plan a response strategy.
机译:随着全球气候变化,灾害是经常发生的,并且持续不断,并且在未来很可能会增加。迄今为止,在减灾,政策和应急管理方面的大量投资未能阻止灾难。他们的反复说明表明,当前的应对措施尚存在一些空白,或者需要以不同的观点来处理迄今为止的危害。本文通过灾害景观的视角来审视灾害,它展示了灾害发生和响应的背景。它发现,响应失败的主要原因之一是在规划中未充分考虑当地的危险环境。报告指出,尽管危害应对措施的全球化正在逐步发展,但在应对脆弱性方面的局部变化方面却不太成功。本文介绍了危险景观的概念框架,并说明了与当地危险景观所采用的方法相对应的各种缺陷。它建议一种综合方法,该方法应考虑危险环境的各个方面,以制定应对策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号