首页> 外文期刊>Neurorehabilitation and neural repair >Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke
【24h】

Test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference of 5 hand function tests in patients with stroke

机译:中风患者的5种手功能测试的重测重现性和最小真实差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective. To investigate the test-retest reproducibility and smallest real difference (SRD) of 3 hand strength tests (grip, palmar pinch, and lateral pinch) and 2 dexterity tests (the Box and Block test [BBT] and the Nine Hole Peg test [NHPT]) in patients with stroke. Methods. The 5 tests were administered on 62 stroke patients in 2 sessions, 3 to 7 days apart. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to determine the level of reproducibility between measurements on 2 sessions. The SRD was used to determine the extent of measurement error because of chance variation in individual patients. SRD percentage (SRD relative to mean score) was used to compare test-retest reliability across tests. We analyzed the group as a whole, then in 2 subgroups (hand spasticity vs none). Results. The test-retest reproducibility of all 5 tests was high for all the patients, with ICCs ranging from 0.85 to 0.98. The SRDs for the more/less affected hand were: 2.9/4.7 kg for the grip test; 1.2/1.3 kg for the palmar pinch test; 1.4/1.0 kg for the lateral pinch test; 5.5/7.8 blocks/minute for the BBT; and 32.8/6.2 seconds for the NHPT. Unacceptably high SRD percentages (>30%) were found for the affected hand using the NHPT (54%), palmar pinch (35%), and lateral pinch (34%). When comparing these indices for participants with spasticity versus none for all 5 tests, the ICCs were lower and the SRD and SRD percentage were higher for the spasticity group. Conclusions. All 5 tests demonstrated satisfactory test-retest reproducibility for a diverse group of patients with stroke. However, all tests showed higher levels of measurement error when performed with the more affected hand and in patients with hypertonicity of that hand. Thus, baseline and postrehabilitation change scores using these common tests of strength and dexterity must be interpreted with some caution, especially in poorly controlled clinical trials. Repeated measures ought to be incorporated to examine reliability within a trial that includes participants with a hypertonic hand.
机译:目的。研究3种手部力量测试(握把,手掌捏和侧捏)和2个敏捷度测试(方盒测试[BBT]和九孔钉测试[NHPT])的重测重现性和最小真实差异(SRD) ])中风患者。方法。这5项测试分别在3至7天的2个疗程中对62名中风患者进行了治疗。组内相关系数(ICC)用于确定2个疗程之间的可重复性水平。由于每个患者的偶然变化,使用SRD来确定测量误差的程度。 SRD百分比(SRD相对于平均分数)用于比较各个测试的重测信度。我们对整个小组进行了分析,然后将其分为2个子组(手痉挛与否)。结果。所有患者的全部5个测试的测试重测重现性均很高,ICC范围为0.85至0.98。受多或少影响的手的SRD为:握力测试为2.9 / 4.7千克; 1.2 / 1.3千克进行手掌捏测试; 1.4 / 1.0 kg用于侧向挤压试验; BBT 5.5 / 7.8块/分钟; NHPT为32.8 / 6.2秒。使用NHPT(54%),手掌捏(35%)和侧面捏(34%)发现患病手的SRD百分比(> 30%)高得令人无法接受。比较具有痉挛状态的参与者的这些指标与所有5个测试中没有一项的比较时,痉挛组的ICC较低,SRD和SRD百分比较高。结论所有5项测试均显示了对不同组的中风患者的满意的重测重现性。但是,当用受影响更大的手进行手术时,所有测试都显示出较高的测量误差水平,并且该手的高渗性患者也是如此。因此,必须谨慎使用这些强度和敏捷度的通用测试来解释基线和康复后的变化评分,尤其是在对照性较差的临床试验中。在包括高渗性手参与者在内的试验中,应采用重复措施来检查其可靠性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号