首页> 外文期刊>Neurological sciences >Gender and triptan efficacy: a pooled analysis of three double-blind, randomized, crossover, multicenter, Italian studies comparing frovatriptan vs. other triptans
【24h】

Gender and triptan efficacy: a pooled analysis of three double-blind, randomized, crossover, multicenter, Italian studies comparing frovatriptan vs. other triptans

机译:性别和曲普坦功效:对三项双盲,随机,交叉,多中心,意大利研究进行汇总分析,比较了弗罗曲普坦与其他曲普坦

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Migraine is three times as common in females as in males, and attacks may be more severe and difficult to treat in women. However, no study specifically addressed possible gender differences in response to antimigraine therapy. The objective of this study was to review the efficacy of frovatriptan vs. other triptans, in the acute treatment of migraine in subgroups of subjects classified according to gender (men vs. women) through a pooled analysis of three individual randomized Italian studies. 414 patients suffering from migraine with or without aura were randomized to frovatriptan 2.5 mg or rizatriptan 10 mg (study 1), frovatriptan 2.5 mg or zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (study 2), frovatriptan 2.5 mg or almotriptan 12.5 mg (study 3). All studies had a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, crossover design. After treating 1-3 episodes of migraine in no more than 3 months with the first treatment, patients switched to the other treatment for the next 3 months. In this analysis, traditional migraine endpoints were compared between the 66 men and 280 women of the intent-to-treat population. At baseline, long-term and debilitating migraine attacks were more frequently reported by women than men. During the observation period, the proportion of pain-free attacks at 2 h did not significantly differ between frovatriptan and the comparators in either men (32 vs. 38 %, p = NS) or women (30 vs. 33 %, p = NS). Pain relief was also similar between treatments for both genders (men: 56 % frovatriptan vs. 57 % comparators; women: 55 vs. 57 %; p = NS for both). The rate of relapse was significantly lower with frovatriptan than with the comparators in men (24 h: 10 vs. 30 %; 48 h: 21 vs. 39 %; p < 0.05) as well as in women (24 h: 14 vs. 23 %; 48 h: 28 vs. 40 %; p < 0.05). The rate of adverse drug reactions was significantly larger with comparators, irrespectively of gender. Although migraine presents in a more severe form in women, frovatriptan seems to retain its good efficacy and favorable sustained antimigraine effect regardless of the gender.
机译:偏头痛是女性的三倍,是男性的三倍,而且发作可能更严重,女性更难治疗。但是,没有研究专门针对抗偏头痛治疗可能存在的性别差异。这项研究的目的是通过对三项意大利随机研究的汇总分析,复查弗罗曲普坦与其他曲普坦在偏头痛的急性治疗中对按性别分类的受试者亚组(男性对女性)的疗效。 414名患有或不伴有先兆偏头痛的患者被随机分配至2.5毫克的弗罗曲普坦或10毫克的利扎曲普坦(研究1),2.5毫克的弗罗曲曲普坦或2.5毫克的佐罗米坦或12.5毫克的阿莫曲普坦(研究3)。所有研究均采用多中心,随机,双盲,交叉设计。第一次治疗在不超过3个月内治疗偏头痛1-3次后,患者在接下来的3个月内改用其他治疗方法。在此分析中,比较了意向性治疗人群的66位男性和280位女性的传统偏头痛终点。在基线时,女性比男性更经常报告长期且令人衰弱的偏头痛发作。在观察期内,在男性(32%vs. 38%,p = NS)或女性(30%vs. 33%,p = NS)中,frovatriptan和比较者在2 h无痛发作的比例没有显着差异。 )。两种治疗方法的疼痛缓解情况也相似(男性:弗罗曲普坦56%vs比较者57%;女性:55%vs. 57%; p =两者均为NS)。弗罗曲普坦的复发率显着低于男性(24 h:10 vs. 30%; 48 h:21 vs. 39%; p <0.05)以及女性(24 h:14vs。 23%; 48小时:28比40%; p <0.05)。不论性别,比较者的药物不良反应发生率明显更高。尽管偏头痛在女性中以更严重的形式出现,但是弗罗曲普坦似乎保留了其良好的疗效和有利的持续抗偏头痛作用,而与性别无关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号