首页> 外文期刊>Natural Hazards >GIS-multicriteria decision analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping: comparing three methods for the Urmia lake basin, Iran
【24h】

GIS-multicriteria decision analysis for landslide susceptibility mapping: comparing three methods for the Urmia lake basin, Iran

机译:GIS-多准则决策分析,用于滑坡敏感性测绘:比较伊朗乌尔米亚湖流域的三种方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The GIS-multicriteria decision analysis (GIS-MCDA) technique is increasingly used for landslide hazard mapping and zonation. It enables the integration of different data layers with different levels of uncertainty. In this study, three different GIS-MCDA methods were applied to landslide susceptibility mapping for the Urmia lake basin in northwest Iran. Nine landslide causal factors were used, whereby parameters were extracted from an associated spatial database. These factors were evaluated, and then, the respective factor weight and class weight were assigned to each of the associated factors. The landslide susceptibility maps were produced based on weighted overly techniques including analytic hierarchy process (AHP), weighted linear combination (WLC) and ordered weighted average (OWA). An existing inventory of known landslides within the case study area was compared with the resulting susceptibility maps. Respectively, Dempster-Shafer Theory was used to carry out uncertainty analysis of GIS-MCDA results. Result of research indicated the AHP performed best in the landslide susceptibility mapping closely followed by the OWA method while the WLC method delivered significantly poorer results. The resulting figures are generally very high for this area, but it could be proved that the choice of method significantly influences the results.
机译:GIS多准则决策分析(GIS-MCDA)技术已越来越多地用于滑坡灾害成图和分区。它可以集成具有不同级别不确定性的不同数据层。在这项研究中,将三种不同的GIS-MCDA方法应用于伊朗西北部Urmia湖盆地的滑坡敏感性图。使用了9个滑坡成因,从而从相关的空间数据库中提取了参数。对这些因素进行了评估,然后将各个因素权重和类别权重分配给每个相关因素。滑坡敏感性图是基于加权过度技术(包括层次分析法(AHP),加权线性组合(WLC)和有序加权平均值(OWA))制作的。将案例研究区域内现有的已知滑坡清单与生成的磁化率图进行比较。分别使用Dempster-Shafer理论对GIS-MCDA结果进行不确定性分析。研究结果表明,层次分析法在滑坡敏感性图上表现最好,其次是OWA方法,而WLC方法的结果差得多。对于该区域,得出的结果通常很高,但是可以证明,方法的选择会显着影响结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号