首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Taylor Francis Open Select >An uncertainty and sensitivity analysis approach for GIS-based multicriteria landslide susceptibility mapping
【2h】

An uncertainty and sensitivity analysis approach for GIS-based multicriteria landslide susceptibility mapping

机译:基于GIS的多准则滑坡敏感性地图的不确定性和敏感性分析方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) methods are increasingly being used in landslide susceptibility mapping. However, the uncertainties that are associated with MCDA techniques may significantly impact the results. This may sometimes lead to inaccurate outcomes and undesirable consequences. This article introduces a new GIS-based MCDA approach. We illustrate the consequences of applying different MCDA methods within a decision-making process through uncertainty analysis. Three GIS-MCDA methods in conjunction with Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) and Dempster–Shafer theory are analyzed for landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) in the Urmia lake basin in Iran, which is highly susceptible to landslide hazards. The methodology comprises three stages. First, the LSM criteria are ranked and a sensitivity analysis is implemented to simulate error propagation based on the MCS. The resulting weights are expressed through probability density functions. Accordingly, within the second stage, three MCDA methods, namely analytical hierarchy process (AHP), weighted linear combination (WLC) and ordered weighted average (OWA), are used to produce the landslide susceptibility maps. In the third stage, accuracy assessments are carried out and the uncertainties of the different results are measured. We compare the accuracies of the three MCDA methods based on (1) the Dempster–Shafer theory and (2) a validation of the results using an inventory of known landslides and their respective coverage based on object-based image analysis of IRS-ID satellite images. The results of this study reveal that through the integration of GIS and MCDA models, it is possible to identify strategies for choosing an appropriate method for LSM. Furthermore, our findings indicate that the integration of MCDA and MCS can significantly improve the accuracy of the results. In LSM, the AHP method performed best, while the OWA reveals better performance in the reliability assessment. The WLC operation yielded poor results.
机译:基于GIS的多准则决策分析(MCDA)方法正越来越多地用于滑坡敏感性地图中。但是,与MCDA技术相关的不确定性可能会严重影响结果。有时这可能会导致结果不准确和不良后果。本文介绍了一种新的基于GIS的MCDA方法。我们通过不确定性分析说明了在决策过程中应用不同的MCDA方法的后果。结合蒙特卡洛模拟(MCS)和Dempster–Shafer理论,分析了三种GIS-MCDA方法对伊朗Urmia湖盆地的滑坡敏感性图(LSM),该方法极易发生滑坡灾害。该方法包括三个阶段。首先,对LSM标准进行排名,并基于MCS进行敏感性分析以模拟错误传播。最终的权重通过概率密度函数表示。因此,在第二阶段内,使用三种MCDA方法(即层次分析法(AHP),加权线性组合(WLC)和有序加权平均值(OWA))来生成滑坡敏感性图。在第三阶段,进行准确性评估,并测量不同结果的不确定性。我们基于(1)Dempster–Shafer理论和(2)使用已知滑坡清单及其各自覆盖率(基于基于IRS-ID卫星的基于对象的图像分析)对三种MCDA方法的准确性进行比较图片。这项研究的结果表明,通过GIS和MCDA模型的集成,可以确定选择适合LSM方法的策略。此外,我们的发现表明,MCDA和MCS的集成可以显着提高结果的准确性。在LSM中,AHP方法效果最好,而OWA在可靠性评估中显示出更好的性能。 WLC操作产生差的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号