...
首页> 外文期刊>Natural Hazards >Market risk in carbon market: an empirical analysis of the EUA and sCER
【24h】

Market risk in carbon market: an empirical analysis of the EUA and sCER

机译:碳市场中的市场风险:EUA和sCER的经验分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The paper uses a capital asset pricing model to analyze the market risk in the European Union Emission Trading System (EU ETS) and clean development mechanisms (CDM) and Zipf analysis technology to analyze the carbon price volatility in different expectations of returns in the two markets. The results show that the systematic risk of the EU ETS market is around 0.07 %, but the CDM market is clearly divided into two stages; the systematic risk of the futures contracts in the first stage (DEC09-DEC12) is less than the EU ETS market, but the systematic risk of the futures contracts that enter the market is greater than the EU ETS market and has a higher market sensitivity, although on the unsystematic risk. The CDM market is always greater than the EU ETS market. Abnormal returns in the two carbon markets are both lower than 0.02 %, but CDM is higher. The probability of price down is greater than that of price up. The carbon price is affected by market mechanisms and external factors (economic crisis and environmental policies) in the low expectations of returns. However, in the high expectations of returns, compared with the CDM market, the carbon price change in the EU ETS market is less stable and has higher risks.
机译:本文使用资本资产定价模型来分析欧盟排放交易系统(EU ETS)中的市场风险,并使用清洁发展机制(CDM)和Zipf分析技术来分析两个市场中不同回报期望下的碳价格波动。 。结果表明,欧盟排放交易体系市场的系统风险约为0.07%,但CDM市场显然分为两个阶段。第一阶段(DEC09-DEC12)的期货合约的系统风险小于欧盟ETS市场,但是进入市场的期货合约的系统风险大于EU ETS市场,并且具有较高的市场敏感性,尽管存在非系统性风险。 CDM市场总是大于EU ETS市场。两个碳市场的异常收益率均低于0.02%,但CDM较高。价格下跌的可能性大于价格上涨的可能性。碳价格受市场机制和外部因素(经济危机和环境政策)的影响,而收益期望却很低。但是,与CDM市场相比,在对收益的期望很高的情况下,EU ETS市场中的碳价变化较不稳定,且风险较高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号