...
首页> 外文期刊>NeuroRehabilitation >Improvements in spasticity and motor function using a static stretching device for people with chronic hemiparesis following stroke
【24h】

Improvements in spasticity and motor function using a static stretching device for people with chronic hemiparesis following stroke

机译:使用静态拉伸装置改善中风后慢性偏瘫的人的痉挛和运动功能

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We investigated the effect of a static stretching device on spasticity and motor function for people with chronic hemiparesis following stroke. Ten participants with chronic hemiparesis following stroke who had severe spasticity and incomplete weakness of the affected wrist and hand were recruited. The stretching device consisted of a resting hand splint, a finger and thumb stretching system, and a frame. The stretched state was maintained for 10 minutes/session, and the static stretching program was performed for 2 sessions/day and 7 days/week for 4 weeks. Spasticity and motor function of the affected wrist and hand were assessed three times with intervals of 4 weeks (twice [Pre-1, Pre-2] before and once [Post-1] after starting the static stretching program). The effect of the static stretching device was assessed using modified Ashworth scale (MAS) scores, by measuring active range of motion (AROM), and using the wrist and hand subsection of the Fugl-Meyer motor assessment (FMA). The main effects of the static stretching program on MAS scores for wrist and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints and FMA scores were significant. AROMs of MCPs and wrist showed an increase, however, no significant main effects of the static stretching program were observed. MAS in flexor muscles of MCP joints showed a significant decreased from Pre-2 (mean ± standard deviation (SD): 2.56 ± 0.55; median and interquartile range (IQR): 2.42, 2.12-3.08) to Post-1 (mean ± SD: 1.05 ± 0.49; median and IQR: 1.08, 0.87-1.50) (P < 0.001), and MAS in wrist flexor muscles also showed a significant decrease from Pre-2 (mean ± SD: 3.20 ± 0.78; median and IQR: 3.0, 2.75-4.0) to Post-1 (mean ± SD: 1.90 ± 0.73; median and IQR: 2.0, 1.0-2.5) (P < 0.001). FMA score also showed a significant increase from Pre-2 (11.3 ± 6.09) to Post-1 (14.5 ± 6.20) (P < 0.001). It was found that the static stretching device effectively relieved spasticity and improved motor function in subjects with severe spasticity and incomplete weakness following stroke.
机译:我们调查了静态拉伸设备对中风后慢性偏瘫患者的痉挛和运动功能的影响。招募了十名中风后慢性偏瘫患者,他们具有严重的痉挛和受影响的手腕和手部不完全虚弱。拉伸设备包括一个静止的手夹板,一个手指和拇指拉伸系统以及一个框架。拉伸状态保持每次10分钟,静态拉伸程序每天进行2次,每周7天,持续4周。评估患肢和手的痉挛和运动功能,每隔4周评估3次(开始静态拉伸程序之前两次[Pre-1,Pre-2]两次,一次[Post-1]之后)。使用改良的Ashworth量表(MAS)评分,测量活动活动范围(AROM)以及Fugl-Meyer运动评估(FMA)的手腕和手部分来评估静态拉伸设备的效果。静态拉伸程序对腕关节和掌指关节(MCP)的MAS评分和FMA评分的主要影响是显着的。 MCP和腕部的AROM显示增加,但是,没有观察到静态拉伸程序的重大影响。 MCP关节屈肌中的MAS显着降低,从Pre-2(平均值±标准差(SD):2.56±0.55;中位数和四分位间距(IQR):2.42,2.12-3.08)降至Post-1(平均值±SD :1.05±0.49;中位数和IQR:1.08,0.87-1.50)(P <0.001),腕屈肌的MAS也比Pre-2显着降低(平均值±SD:3.20±0.78;中位数和IQR:3.0 (2.75-4.0)至Post-1(平均值±SD:1.90±0.73;中位数和IQR:2.0、1.0-2.5)(P <0.001)。 FMA评分也显示从2级前(11.3±6.09)到1级后(14.5±6.20)显着增加(P <0.001)。已经发现,静态拉伸装置有效地缓解了患有严重痉挛和中风后虚弱的受试者的痉挛和改善了运动功能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号