首页> 外文期刊>Neurological Research: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly Journal >Effect of clot removal and the different incidence of vasospasm between clipping and GDC.
【24h】

Effect of clot removal and the different incidence of vasospasm between clipping and GDC.

机译:清除和GDC之间的凝块清除效果和不同的血管痉挛发生率。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The removal of subarachnoid clot has been thought to be effective for prevention of cerebral vasospasm. However, it is suggested that the incidence of cerebral vasospasm is not high in the cases where ruptured cerebral aneurysms are obliterated using Guglielmi detachable coils (GDC) without clot removal. The effect of subarachnoid clot removal on the occurrence of cerebral vasospasm and the different incidence of cerebral vasospasm between clipping cases and in GDC cases are reviewed.Surgical clot removal in experimental model indicated marked preventive effect on cerebral vasospasm. However, the clinical trials of clot removal during early aneurysm surgery had failed to show satisfactory preventive effect for vasospasm, and the cumulative incidence of symptomatic vasospasm in these trials was 29%. As fibrinolytic drug, intrathecal administration of tissue plasminogen activator showed sufficient elimination of subarachnoid clot and prevention of cerebral vasospasm in the experimental studies and in theclinical case trials and nonrandomized case-control trials. However, the multi-center, randomized case-control trial showed no statistically significant effect on symptomatic cerebral vasospasm. On the other hand, the cumulative incidence of cerebral vasospasm in GDC cases was 20%. The comparative studies of the incidence of vasospasm between GDC cases and in clipping cases also showed less incidence of symptomatic vasospasm and a more favorable outcome in GDC cases. From the results of studies reviewed, the incidence of cerebral vasospasm seems less in GDC cases than in clipping cases. It should be clarified why clipping could not be dominant in the prevention of cerebral vasospasm compared to GDC.
机译:蛛网膜下腔血块的去除被认为对预防脑血管痉挛有效。但是,建议在使用Guglielmi可分离线圈(GDC)清除血凝块而消除破裂的脑动脉瘤的情况下,脑血管痉挛的发生率不高。回顾了蛛网膜下腔清除血块对脑血管痉挛发生的影响以及剪裁病例与GDC病例之间脑血管痉挛发生率的不同。实验模型中的手术清除血凝块对脑血管痉挛具有明显的预防作用。但是,在早期动脉瘤手术期间清除血块的临床试验未能显示令人满意的血管痉挛预防效果,这些试验中症状性血管痉挛的累积发生率为29%。作为纤维蛋白溶解药物,鞘内注射组织纤溶酶原激活剂在实验研究以及临床病例试验和非随机病例对照试验中均显示出蛛网膜下腔血块的充分消除和脑血管痉挛的预防。但是,这项多中心,随机病例对照试验显示,对症状性脑血管痉挛没有统计学意义的影响。另一方面,GDC病例中脑血管痉挛的累积发生率为20%。对GDC病例和截断病例之间的血管痉挛发生率的比较研究还显示,症状性血管痉挛的发生率较低,GDC病例的预后较好。从回顾的研究结果来看,GDC病例中脑血管痉挛的发生率似乎比限幅病例中的少。应该阐明为什么与GDC相比,剪裁在预防脑血管痉挛中不能占主导地位。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号