首页> 外文期刊>Neurocritical care >Comparison of hematoma shape and volume estimates in warfarin versus non-warfarin-related intracerebral hemorrhage.
【24h】

Comparison of hematoma shape and volume estimates in warfarin versus non-warfarin-related intracerebral hemorrhage.

机译:华法林与非华法林相关脑出血的血肿形状和体积估计值的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

BACKGROUND: Hematoma volume is a major determinant of outcome in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Accurate volume measurements are critical for predicting outcome and are thought to be more difficult in patients with oral anticoagulation-related ICH (OAT-ICH) due to a higher frequency of irregular shape. We examined hematoma shape and methods of volume assessment in patients with OAT-ICH. METHODS: We performed a case-control analysis of a prospectively identified cohort of consecutive patients with ICH. We retrospectively reviewed 50 consecutive patients with OAT-ICH and 50 location-matched non-OAT-ICH controls. Two independent readers analyzed CT scans for hematoma shape and volume using both ABC/2 and ABC/3 methods. Readers were blinded to all clinical variables including warfarin status. Gold-standard ICH volumes were determined using validated computer-assisted planimetry. RESULTS: Within this cohort, median INR in patients with OAT-ICH was 3.2. Initial ICH volume was not significantly different between non-OAT-ICH and OAT-ICH (35 +/- 38 cc vs. 53 +/- 56 cc, P = 0.4). ICH shape did not differ by anticoagulation status (round shape in 10% of OAT-ICH vs. 16% of non-OAT-ICH, P = 0.5). The ABC/3 calculation underestimated median volume by 9 (3-28) cc, while the ABC/2 calculation did so by 4 (0.8-12) cc. CONCLUSIONS: Hematoma shape was not statistically significantly different in patients with OAT-ICH. Among bedside approaches, the standard ABC/2 method offers reasonable approximation of hematoma volume in OAT-ICH and non-OAT-ICH.
机译:背景:血肿量是脑出血(ICH)患者预后的主要决定因素。准确的体积测量对于预测结果至关重要,并且由于不规则形状的发生频率较高,因此对于口服抗凝相关性ICH(OAT-ICH)患者而言,准确的体积测量更加困难。我们检查了OAT-ICH患者的血肿形状和容量评估方法。方法:我们对前瞻性确定的连续性ICH患者队列进行了病例对照分析。我们回顾性回顾了50例连续的OAT-ICH患者和50例位置匹配的非OAT-ICH对照。两名独立的读者使用ABC / 2和ABC / 3方法分析了CT扫描的血肿形状和体积。读者不了解所有临床变量,包括华法林状态。黄金标准的ICH量是使用经过验证的计算机辅助平面测定法确定的。结果:在该队列中,OAT-ICH患者的中位INR为3.2。非OAT-ICH和OAT-ICH之间的初始ICH体积没有显着差异(35 +/- 38 cc和53 +/- 56 cc,P = 0.4)。 ICH的形状在抗凝状态方面没有差异(OAT-ICH的10%与非OAT-ICH的16%为圆形,P = 0.5)。 ABC / 3计算低估了中位数体积9(3-28)cc,而ABC / 2计算低了中位数体积4(0.8-12)cc。结论:OAT-ICH患者的血肿形状无统计学差异。在床旁方法中,标准的ABC / 2方法可为OAT-ICH和非OAT-ICH中的血肿量提供合理的近似值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号