首页> 外文期刊>Cancer Treatment Reviews >Surgical and ablative therapies for the management of adrenal 'oligometastases' - A systematic review
【24h】

Surgical and ablative therapies for the management of adrenal 'oligometastases' - A systematic review

机译:肾上腺“寡转移”的外科手术和消融疗法-系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: We systematically reviewed the literature on the use of surgery, stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) and percutaneous catheter ablation (PCA) techniques for the treatment of adrenal metastases to develop evidence-based recommendations. Methods: A systematic review of the MEDLINE database was performed using structured search terms following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible publications were those published from 1990 to 2012, written in English, had at least five patients treated for adrenal metastasis and reported on patient clinical outcomes (local control, survival and treatment related complications/toxicity). Where possible, pooled 2-year local control and overall survival outcomes were analysed. Results: Our search strategy produced a total of 45 papers addressing the three modalities - 30 adrenalectomy, nine SABR and six PCA (818, 178 and 51 patients, respectively). There was marked heterogeneity in outcome reporting, patient selection and follow-up periods between studies. The weighted 2-year local control and overall survival for adrenalectomy were 84% and 46%, respectively, compared with 63% and 19%, respectively for the SABR cohort. Only one study of PCA with five patients analysed clinical outcomes, reporting an actuarial local control of 80% at 1. year. Treatment related complications/toxicities were inconsistently reported. Conclusion: There is insufficient evidence to determine the best local treatment modality for isolated or limited adrenal metastases from any primary tumour. Published data suggests adrenalectomy to be a reasonable treatment approach for isolated adrenal metastasis in suitable patients. SABR is a valid alternative in cases when surgery is not feasible or the operative risk is unacceptable. PCA cannot be recommended until there are more robust studies which include long-term oncological outcomes.
机译:背景:我们系统地回顾了有关外科手术,立体定向消融身体放射疗法(SABR)和经皮导管消融(PCA)技术用于治疗肾上腺转移瘤的文献,以建立循证推荐。方法:按照PRISMA指南,使用结构化搜索词对MEDLINE数据库进行系统的审查。符合条件的出版物为1990年至2012年用英语撰写的出版物,至少有5名患者接受了肾上腺转移治疗,并报告了患者的临床结局(局部控制,生存率和与治疗相关的并发症/毒性)。在可能的情况下,分析了合并的2年局部控制和总体生存结果。结果:我们的搜索策略共针对45种论文提出了三种方法:30种肾上腺切除术,9种SABR和6种PCA(分别为818、178和51例患者)。研究之间的结果报告,患者选择和随访期间存在明显的异质性。肾上腺切除术的加权2年局部控制和总生存率分别为84%和46%,而SABR队列分别为63%和19%。只有一项PCA研究与5位患者进行了分析,分析了临床结局,报告在1年时精算局部控制率为80%。不一致报道了与治疗有关的并发症/毒性。结论:没有足够的证据来确定针对任何原发性肿瘤的孤立或有限的肾上腺转移的最佳局部治疗方式。已发表的数据表明,对于合适的患者,肾上腺切除术是孤立的肾上腺转移的合理治疗方法。如果手术不可行或手术风险不可接受,则SABR是一种有效的选择。不推荐使用PCA,除非有更可靠的研究包括长期的肿瘤学结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号