...
首页> 外文期刊>Neuroradiology >Cerebral perfusion computerized tomography: influence of reference vessels, regions of interest and interobserver variability.
【24h】

Cerebral perfusion computerized tomography: influence of reference vessels, regions of interest and interobserver variability.

机译:脑灌注计算机断层扫描:参考血管,感兴趣的区域和观察者间的变异性的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

INTRODUCTION: There are still no standardized guidelines for perfusion computerized tomography (PCT) analysis. METHODS: A total of 61 PCT studies were analyzed using either the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) or the middle cerebral artery (MCA) as the arterial reference, and the superior sagittal sinus (SSS) or the vein of Galen (VG) as the venous reference. The sizes of regions of interest (ROI) were investigated comparing PCT results obtained using a hemispheric ROI combined with vascular pixel elimination with those obtained using five smaller ROIs located over the cortex and basal ganglia. In addition, interobserver variations were explored using a standardized protocol. RESULTS: MCA-based measurements of cerebral blood flow (CBF) and blood volume (CBV) were in accordance with those obtained with the ACA except in 16 patients with ischemic stroke, in whom CBF was overestimated by the ipsilateral MCA. Venous maximal intensity was significantly lower with the VG when compared with the SSS, resulting in overestimation of CBF and CBV. However, in 13.3% of patients the VG ROI yielded higher maximal intensities than the SSS ROI. There was no difference in PCT results between hemispheric ROI and averaged separate ROI when vascular pixel elimination was used. Finally, interobserver variations were as high as 11% for CBF and 12% for CBV. CONCLUSION: The present results suggest that pathological rather than anatomical considerations should dictate the choice of the arterial ROI. For venous ROI, although SSS seems to be adequate in most instances, deep cerebral veins may occasionally generate higher maximal intensities and should therefore be selected. Importantly, significant user-dependency should be taken into account.
机译:简介:尚无用于灌注计算机断层扫描(PCT)分析的标准化指南。方法:使用前脑动脉(ACA)或大脑中动脉(MCA)作为动脉参考,上矢状窦(SSS)或盖伦静脉(VG)作为分析对象,共分析了61项PCT研究。静脉参考。研究了感兴趣区域(ROI)的大小,将使用半球ROI与去除血管像素相结合的PCT结果与使用位于皮质和基底神经节上的五个较小ROI所获得的PCT结果进行了比较。另外,使用标准化协议探索了观察者之间的差异。结果:基于MCA的脑血流量(CBF)和血容量(CBV)的测量与通过ACA获得的测量结果一致,除了16例缺血性卒中患者,其同侧MCA估计过高。与SSS相比,VG的静脉最大强度明显降低,导致CBF和CBV的高估。但是,在13.3%的患者中,VG ROI产生的最大强度高于SSS ROI。使用血管像素消除后,半球ROI和平均单独ROI之间的PCT结果无差异。最后,观察者之间的差异对于CBF高达11%,对于CBV高达12%。结论:目前的结果表明,病理学而不是解剖学的考虑应该决定动脉ROI的选择。对于静脉ROI,尽管在大多数情况下SSS似乎足够,但脑深静脉偶尔可能会产生更高的最大强度,因此应选择。重要的是,应考虑到很大的用户依赖性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号