...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurology India. >Comparison of diffusion tensor image study in association fiber tracts among normal, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's patients.
【24h】

Comparison of diffusion tensor image study in association fiber tracts among normal, amnestic mild cognitive impairment, and Alzheimer's patients.

机译:正常,遗忘性轻度认知障碍和阿尔茨海默氏病患者在关联纤维束中扩散张量图像研究的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIM : To compare diffusion tensor image (DTI) study in association fiber tracts among normal control (NC), amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) subjects. To assess diagnostic value of DTI in aMCI and differential diagnosis of DTI study between aMCI and AD. MATERIAL AND METHODS : DTI was used to assess changes in cerebral association fiber tracts in NC, aMCI, and AD subjects (n = 20/group). Regions of interest included the inferior fronto-occipital fascicles (IFOF), superior longitudinal fascicles and cingulum tract, genu of corpus callosum (Gcc) was set right, splenium of corpus callosum was set left. Bilateral fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient values were compared in three groups. RESULTS : Relative to NC, aMCI subjects had significantly different FA values for the IFOF and cingulum tract, while AD subjects had significantly different FA values of IFOF, Gcc, and cingulum tract. Relative to aMCI, AD subjects had significantly different FA values of cingulum tract. CONCLUSION : Based on the results, DTI could be used as a diagnostic method for aMCI with abnormal changes in IFOF and cingulum tract. DTI could also be used for differential diagnosis of aMCI and AD by comparing FA values of the cingulum tract. Abnormal FA values of IFOF, Gcc, and cingulum tract in AD patients may help to elucidate the pathological processes in this disease.
机译:目的:比较正常对照(NC),轻度轻度认知障碍(aMCI)和阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)受试者在关联纤维束中的扩散张量图像(DTI)研究。评估DTI在aMCI中的诊断价值以及aMCI与AD之间DTI研究的鉴别诊断。材料与方法:DTI用于评估NC,aMCI和AD受试者的脑缔合纤维束变化(n = 20 /组)。感兴趣的区域包括额枕下束(IFOF),上纵束和扣带,,体属(Gcc)位于右侧,call体脾位于左侧。在三组中比较了双边分数各向异性(FA)和表观扩散系数值。结果:相对于NC,aMCI受试者的IFOF和扣带的FA值显着不同,而AD受试者的IFOF,Gcc和扣带的FA值显着不同。相对于aMCI,AD受试者的扣带FA值显着不同。结论:根据结果,DTI可作为aMCI的IFOF和扣带异常改变的诊断方法。通过比较扣带的FA值,DTI也可以用于aMCI和AD的鉴别诊断。 AD患者的IFOF,Gcc和扣带的FA值异常可能有助于阐明该疾病的病理过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号