...
首页> 外文期刊>Biological Control: Theory and Application in Pest Management >Evaluation of the codling moth granulovirus and spinosad for codling moth control and impact on non-target species in pear orchards
【24h】

Evaluation of the codling moth granulovirus and spinosad for codling moth control and impact on non-target species in pear orchards

机译:评估苹果花蛾颗粒病毒和多杀菌素对苹果花蛾的控制以及对梨园非目标物种的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We compared the efficacy of a commercial preparation of the codling moth, Cydia pomonella L., granulovirus, CpGV (Cyd-X) and spinosad (Entrust) at operational rates for codling moth control in 2004 and 2005. Concurrently we monitored the impact of treatments on populations of non-target arthropods. Spinosad was effective at protecting fruit, with ≦1.6% codling moth injury in experimental plots, compared with up to 37% injury in the untreated plots at harvest. Mid-season outbreaks of the pear psylla, Cacopsylla pyricola Forster, were also reduced in spinosad plots. Spinosad was safe for several predators, notably the psylla predator Deraeocoris brevis Uhler, but reduced the abundance of hymenopteran parasitoids by 24% and 40% and non-target Diptera by 49% and 35%, respectively in 2004 and 2005. We found no evidence that spinosad disrupted natural control leading to increased densities of secondary pests including aphids and phytophagous mites. CpGV was less effective than spinosad at protecting fruit, with percentage of fruits attacked similar to controls, but killed the majority (67–71%) of neonate coding moth larvae and did not harm non-target species. Additional observations were conducted in commercial orchards (mixed pear and apple) where CpGV and spinosad were used operationally against existing codling moth infestations. In pear, two spray programs applied in replicated 0.4 ha blocks (i.e. CpGV followed by spinosad against the first and second larval generations, respectively and vice versa) reduced fruit injury at harvest and decreased orchard pheromone monitoring trap catches by 74% over two years. In apple, CpGV was less effective at protecting fruit in the first larval generation compared with spinosad, although population suppression was effective early in the season. Spinosad caused no disruptions of beneficial species or secondary pest outbreaks were observed in the commercial orchards. Our results suggest CpGV and spinosad can be effectively used in integrated pest management for codling moth.
机译:我们比较了2004年和2005年商业化生产苹果d蛾,Cydia pomonella L.,颗粒病毒,CpGV(Cyd-X)和多杀菌素(Entrust)的药效,以控制苹果d蛾。同时,我们监测了治疗的影响非目标节肢动物的数量。 Spinosad可有效保护果实,在试验田中,蛾受害≤1.6%,而未处理田中收获时高达37%。在多刺的地块中,梨木虱季内暴发(Cacopsylla pyricola Forster)也有所减少。 Spinosad对几种食肉动物是安全的,特别是木虱食肉动物Deraeocoris brevis Uhler,但在2004年和2005年分别将膜翅目寄生虫的丰富度降低了24%和40%,将非目标双翅目的丰富度降低了49%和35%。我们没有发现证据。多杀菌素破坏了自然控制,导致包括蚜虫和食草螨在内的次生害虫的密度增加。 CpGV在保护果实方面不如多杀菌素有效,攻击的果实百分率与对照相似,但杀死了大多数编码蛾类幼虫的新生儿(67-71%),并且没有伤害非目标物种。在商业果园(梨和苹果混合)中进行了其他观察,其中将CpGV和多杀菌素有效地用于对抗现有的苹果mo蛾侵扰。在梨中,在重复的0.4公顷块体中施用了两种喷洒程序(即CpGV,然后分别是针对第一和第二代幼虫的多杀菌素,反之亦然)减少了收获时的果实伤害,并在两年内将果园信息素监测陷阱的捕获减少了74%。在苹果中,CpGV在第一个幼虫世代中保护水果的效果不如多杀菌素,尽管在季节初期抑制种群有效。在商业果园中未观察到多杀菌素引起有益物种的破坏或继发性害虫暴发。我们的结果表明,CpGV和多杀菌素可有效地用于苹果蛾的综合害虫管理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号