首页> 外文期刊>Biological invasions >Human Agency in Biological Invasions: Secondary Releases Foster Naturalisation and Population Expansion of Alien Plant Species
【24h】

Human Agency in Biological Invasions: Secondary Releases Foster Naturalisation and Population Expansion of Alien Plant Species

机译:人类在生物入侵中的作用:次级释放促进外来植物的归化和种群扩展

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The human mediation of biological invasions is still an underestimated phenomenon. This paper attempts to show that introductions on varying spatial scales may strongly foster invasions throughout the whole invasion process. As shown by data from central Europe, invasions frequently result from an interplay of biological and anthropogenic mechanisms. The latter, however, cannot be explained nor predicted by ecological rules. This may be an important reason for the limited predictability of invasions. Initial introductions from a donor to a new range are here distinguished from following secondary releases within the new range. The rate of naturalisation is higher in deliberately introduced plants as compared to accidental introductions. Due to higher numbers of accidental introductions, such species contribute significantly to the pool of naturalised species. Secondary releases of alien species are frequently made over long periods subsequent to the initial introduction. They may mimic demographic and dispersal processes that lead to population growth and range expansion. They also offer a pathway to overcome spatial isolation in species whose propagules are not naturally moved long distances. This even holds for most of Germany's noxious alien plant species. Secondary releases may thus promote invasions even beyond the threshold of naturalisation. In consequence, attempts at prevention should focus on secondary releases as well as on initial introductions. In the last section of the paper, the final invasion stage subsequent to naturalisation is shown as a multi-scale phenomenon. In consequence, the classification of a species as 'invasive' depends on the perspective chosen. Using different biologically or anthropocentrically based approaches leads to sub-sets of alien species that overlap only partially. In conclusion, the term 'invasive' should preferably be used in a broader sense to describe the entire invasion process.
机译:人类对生物入侵的调解仍然是一种被低估的现象。本文试图表明,在不同的空间尺度上进行介绍可能会在整个入侵过程中极大地促进入侵。如中欧的数据所示,入侵通常是由于生物机制和人为机制的相互作用造成的。但是,后者不能用生态规律来解释或预测。这可能是入侵的可预测性有限的重要原因。从捐助者到新范围的最初介绍与在新范围内的后续二次发布相区别。有意引进的植物的归化率高于偶然引入的植物。由于意外引入的数量增加,此类物种为归化物种库做出了重要贡献。外来物种的二次释放通常是在首次引入后很长时间内进行的。它们可能模仿人口和分散过程,从而导致人口增长和范围扩大。它们还提供了克服繁殖体不能自然长距离移动的物种中空间隔离的途径。这甚至适用于德国大多数有害的外来植物物种。因此,二次释放可能会促进入侵,甚至超出入籍的门槛。因此,预防工作应着眼于二次释放以及最初的引进。在本文的最后部分,归化之后的最终入侵阶段显示为多尺度现象。因此,将物种分类为“入侵”取决于所选择的观点。使用不同的基于生物学或人类中心论的方法会导致仅部分重叠的外来物种亚集。总之,“侵入性”一词最好在广义上用于描述整个侵入过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号