首页> 外文期刊>Mysore journal of agricultural sciences >Economic Analysis of Urbanisation Impact on Different Social Groups Located inFringes of Bengaluru Urban
【24h】

Economic Analysis of Urbanisation Impact on Different Social Groups Located inFringes of Bengaluru Urban

机译:城市化对位于班加罗尔城市边缘的不同社会群体的影响的经济学分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The study was conducted in Ramanagara District of Karnataka state. Two categories of rural fold considered were: 1) men, women and children and 2) Agricultural labour, marginal farmers, small farmers, medium farmers, large farmers. According to farmers' perception, urbanization had negative impact (about 60% and 63 % in the case of rainfed and irrigated situation, respectively) on the men community as it created shortage of agriculture labour and also loss of interest in the farming activity. Farmersfelt that urbanization had both positive (better non-agricultural jobs, leisure, and reduction in the work load due to new technologies) and negative impact (imparts laziness) on the women community. Urbanization had positive impact (65 % and 70% in thecase of rainfed and irrigated situations) on the children as it created better school facilities in turn helping for over all development of the children. Farmers felt that urbanization had positive impact (60 % and 68 % in the case of rainfed and irrigated situations) on labour as it creates better job opportunities for them, thereby increasing their standard of leaving. Farmers perceived that urbanization has negative impact (about 55% and 63% of rainfed and irrigated farmers, respectively) on marginal farmers as there was difficulty in investing on land for commercialized farming and also fear of losing lands. Urbanization had negative impact (60% and 68% in the case of rainfed and irrigated situations, respectively) on the small farmers. Urbanisation had both positive and negative impact on medium farmers. Urbanization had negative impact (65% and 53% of the sample farmers from rainfed and irrigated situations, respectively) on large farmers as it was difficult to get the agricultural labour forwork and larger land holdings calls for larger investment, market risk and prove to theft of the produce.
机译:该研究是在卡纳塔克邦拉马纳加拉区进行的。考虑的两类农村褶皱是:1)男人,女人和儿童; 2)农业劳动力,边际农民,小农,中农和大农。根据农民的看法,城市化对男性社区产生了负面影响(在雨水和灌溉情况下分别约为60%和63%),因为这造成了农业劳动力的短缺,也使人们对农业活动失去了兴趣。农民认为,城市化对妇女社区既有积极的作用(更好的非农业工作,休闲和新技术带来的工作量减少),也有不利的影响(包括懒惰)。城市化对儿童产生了积极的影响(在雨育和灌溉情况下为65%和70%),因为它创造了更好的学校设施,进而帮助了儿童的全面发展。农民认为城市化对劳动力产生了积极的影响(在雨水和灌溉条件下为60%和68%),因​​为它为他们创造了更好的工作机会,从而提高了他们的离职标准。农民认为城市化对边际农民有负面影响(分别占雨养农户和灌溉农户的55%和63%),原因是难以投资用于商业化农业的土地,也担心失去土地。城市化对小农户产生了负面影响(在雨水和灌溉情况下分别为60%和68%)。城市化对中型农民既有正面影响,也有负面影响。城市化对大型农户产生了负面影响(分别有65%和53%的样本农户受到雨水和灌溉的影响),因为难以获得农业劳动力的工作,而较大的土地持有量则需要较大的投资,市场风险并证明被盗产品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号