...
首页> 外文期刊>Neonatology >Oral versus nasal route for placing feeding tubes: no effect on hypoxemia and bradycardia in infants with apnea of prematurity.
【24h】

Oral versus nasal route for placing feeding tubes: no effect on hypoxemia and bradycardia in infants with apnea of prematurity.

机译:口服和鼻腔放置喂养管的方式:对早产呼吸暂停的婴儿低氧血症和心动过缓没有影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Raised upper airway resistance may be involved in apnea of prematurity (AOP). OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of an oral versus a nasal gastric tube on episodes of hypoxemia and bradycardia in infants with AOP. METHODS: In a randomized controlled cross-over trial, 32 infants (median gestational age 29 (range 24-31) weeks, postmenstrual age at study 32 (range 30-35) weeks) with the need for tube feeding and symptoms of AOP underwent a 24-hour recording of breathing movements, nasal airflow, heart rate, pulse oximeter saturation and pulse waveforms. A 5-Fr feeding tube was placed orally or nasally for 12 h each, the position selected first was randomly assigned. When the feeding tube was placed nasally, always the smaller nostril was selected. Each infant acted as his/her own control. Recordings were analyzed for the summed rate of bradycardia and desaturation (heart rate <2/3 of baseline, saturation
机译:背景:上呼吸道阻力升高可能与早产呼吸暂停(AOP)有关。目的:确定口腔和鼻胃管对AOP婴儿低氧血症和心动过缓发作的影响。方法:在一项随机对照试验中,对32名需要管饲和AOP症状的婴儿(中位妊娠年龄29(24-31)周,月经后年龄32(30-35)周)进行了研究。 24小时记录呼吸运动,鼻气流​​,心率,脉搏血氧饱和度和脉搏波形。将5-Fr饲管分别经口或经鼻放置12 h,首先选择随机分配的位置。当鼻饲管放置时,总是选择较小的鼻孔。每个婴儿都充当自己的控制者。分析记录的心动过缓和去饱和度的总和(心率<基线的2/3,饱和度<或= 80%)。结果:放置喂食管的途径对心动过缓和不饱和度的总和没有明显影响(鼻途径:中位数1.6,CI为0.8-1.9;口服途径:中位数1.0,CI为0.9-1.6,P = 0.25)。结论:我们不能确定在这些患有AOP的婴儿中口服喂食管的优势,因为口服途径并不能改善他们的AOP症状。可能的解释包括:(i)插入较小鼻孔的5-Fr鼻胃管增加的鼻气道阻力过小,不会对AOP产生任何影响; (ii)迷走神经刺激的增强会抵消口服途径的任何益处,或者(iii)研究持续时间太短,无法检测出AOP的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号