首页> 外文期刊>Nephron >Bedside Estimation of the Glomerular Filtration Rate in Hospitalized Elderly Patients
【24h】

Bedside Estimation of the Glomerular Filtration Rate in Hospitalized Elderly Patients

机译:住院老年患者肾小球滤过率的床边估计

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aims: To evaluate the quality of bedside estimation of glomerularfiltration rate (GFR) in hospitalized elderly patients. Methods: We evaluated common estimators of GFR in 29 women and 32 men aged 60 and older hospitalized in a geriatric ward: creatinine clearance (CCR), the Cockcroft-Gault formula (CG), the modification of diet in renal disease formula (MDRD), Baracskay formula (BAR), and a newly developed formula derived recently by us (GCM). Inulin clearance (CINU) was used to assess GFR. Exclusion criteria were mental illness and urinary incontinence. Results: According to Bland and Altman accuracy and precision of all estimators were low and there was an underestimation of actual GFR: CCR 38.9 ml/min; CG 39.7 ml/min; MDRD 19.8 ml/min; BAR 34.0 ml/min, and GCM: 24.7 ml/min. The accuracy and precision of all methods were even lower in patients with a GFR of >90 ml/min and in patients with diabetes. In receiver-operating characteristics (ROC analysis) all formulas were superiorto serum creatinine and overall MDRD disclosed the best results in detecting both a GFR of <90 ml/min and <60 ml/min. Conclusions: In general, estimation errors are large in an acute care setting. However, formula estimation is clearly superior to serum creatinine and CCR. MDRD gave the best results but may be replaced by the more simple CG and GCM formulas, whereas BAR was inferior.
机译:目的:评价住院老年患者在床旁估计肾小球滤过率(GFR)的质量。方法:我们评估了在老年病房住院的29名女性和32名60岁及以上的男性和32名男性中GFR的常见估计值:肌酐清除率(CCR),考克罗夫特-高特公式(CG),肾脏疾病公式饮食的修改(MDRD) ,Baracskay公式(BAR)和最近由我们导出的最新开发的公式(GCM)。菊粉清除率(CINU)用于评估GFR。排除标准为精神疾病和尿失禁。结果:根据Bland和Altman的估计,所有估算器的准确性和精密度均较低,实际GFR值被低估了:CCR 38.9 ml / min; CCR 38.9 ml / min。 CG 39.7毫升/分钟; MDRD 19.8 ml / min; BAR 34.0 ml / min,GCM:24.7 ml / min。 GFR> 90 ml / min的患者和糖尿病患者,所有方法的准确性和精密度均更低。在接受者操作特征(ROC分析)中,所有配方均优于血清肌酐,总体MDRD揭示了在检测GFR <90 ml / min和<60 ml / min方面的最佳结果。结论:一般来说,在急诊环境中估计误差很大。但是,配方估算显然优于血清肌酐和CCR。 MDRD效果最好,但可以用更简单的CG和GCM公式代替,而BAR则逊色。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号