首页> 外文期刊>Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation: official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association >Comparison of skinfold thicknesses and bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of body fat in patients on long-term haemodialysis therapy.
【24h】

Comparison of skinfold thicknesses and bioelectrical impedance analysis with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of body fat in patients on long-term haemodialysis therapy.

机译:长期血液透析治疗中患者的皮脂厚度和生物电阻抗分析与双能X射线吸收法的比较,以评估患者体内的脂肪。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND:Body composition assessment in patients with chronic renal failure is of paramount importance since studies have demonstrated the association of protein-energy malnutrition with an increased morbidity and mortality in this population. However, practical and sensible indicators of body compartments are still needed for clinical purposes. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the simple methods of skinfold thicknesses (SKF) and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) as a reference method, for the assessment of body fat in patients on long-term haemodialysis therapy. METHODS:We studied 30 clinically stable patients (15 men/15 women) undergoing haemodialysis at the Dialysis Unit of the Federal University of Sao Paulo. Body fat assessment was performed by the SKF, BIA and DEXA methods after a haemodialysis session. Analysis of variance, intra-class correlation coefficient and Bland and Altman plot analysis were used for comparative analysis among the methods. RESULTS:Body fat estimates by SKF (17.7+/-7.8 kg) and BIA (18.6+/-9.2 kg) were not significantly different from those obtained by DEXA (18.2+/-7.9 kg) considering the whole population. However, the BIA technique worked differently from DEXA when analysed by gender, measuring less fat content in men and higher fat content in women (P<0.01). No differences were observed for SKF. Strong intra-class correlation coefficients (r) were found between DEXA with SKF (r=0.94) and BIA (r=0.91). DEXA showed a relatively good agreement with both SKF [0.47+/-2.8 (-5.0 to 6.0) kg] and BIA [-0.39+/-3.3 (-6.9 to 6.1) kg] in all patients according to the Bland and Altman plot analysis. However, considering gender, BIA showed greater mean prediction error of 1.93+/-2.5 (-3.0 to 6.8) kg for men and -2.71+/-2.3 (-7.2 to 1.8) kg for women. CONCLUSIONS:The simple and long established method of SKF was preferable over BIA, which showed gender-specific variability in the assessment of body fat in patients undergoing haemodialysis. However, more comparative and longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the applicability of these practical methods for monitoring body composition in the routine care of patients with chronic renal failure.
机译:背景:慢性肾功能衰竭患者的身体成分评估至关重要,因为研究表明蛋白质能量营养不良与该人群发病率和死亡率增加相关。然而,出于临床目的,仍然需要实用且合理的身体隔室指示剂。因此,我们旨在使用双能X射线吸收法(DEXA)作为参考方法,评估皮肤皱折厚度(SKF)和生物电阻抗分析(BIA)的简单方法,以评估长期接受治疗的患者体内的脂肪长期血液透析治疗。方法:我们研究了30名在圣保罗联邦大学透析科接受血液透析的临床稳定患者(15例男性/ 15例女性)。血液透析后,通过SKF,BIA和DEXA方法进行体脂评估。方法之间的比较分析采用方差分析,类内相关系数以及Bland和Altman图分析。结果:考虑到整个人群,通过SKF(17.7 +/- 7.8 kg)和BIA(18.6 +/- 9.2 kg)估计的身体脂肪与通过DEXA(18.2 +/- 7.9 kg)获得的估计值无显着差异。但是,按性别进行分析时,BIA技术与DEXA的工作方式不同,男性的脂肪含量较低,女性的脂肪含量较高(P <0.01)。没有观察到SKF的差异。在具有SKF的DEXA(r = 0.94)和BIA(r = 0.91)之间发现强的类内相关系数(r)。根据Bland和Altman图,在所有患者中,DEXA与SKF [0.47 +/- 2.8(-5.0至6.0)公斤]和BIA [-0.39 +/- 3.3(-6.9至6.1)公斤]均显示出相对较好的一致性分析。但是,考虑到性别,BIA显示男性的平均预测误差更大,男性为1.93 +/- 2.5(-3.0至6.8)千克,女性为-2.71 +/- 2.3(-7.2至1.8)千克。结论:SKF的简单且长期建立的方法优于BIA,后者在血液透析患者的体脂评估中显示出性别差异。然而,需要更多的比较和纵向研究来评估这些实用的方法在监测慢性肾衰竭患者的常规护理中监测身体成分的适用性。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号