首页> 外文期刊>Nephrology nursing journal: journal of the American Nephrology Nurses’ Association >Factors affecting the safety of infusing recirculated saline or blood in hemodialysis.
【24h】

Factors affecting the safety of infusing recirculated saline or blood in hemodialysis.

机译:影响血液透析中注入循环盐水或血液安全性的因素。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

It is not surprising that there is no documented evidence supporting a standard for safe infusion of recirculated saline or blood in hemodialysis. A number of factors affect the bacteriologic and pyrogenic quality of recirculated saline and how individuals will physiologically respond to the final product. Attention to strict asepsis when preparing the dialysis circuit, bacterial quality of the dialysate, characteristics of the dialyzer used, and individual physiological response to the presence of endotoxins all play a part in whether individuals being dialyzed experience a pyrogenic response. Those who depend on chronic hemodialysis utilizing catheter access may be especially vulnerable due to the possibility of continued bacterial growth in the catheter lumen. Unit policy regarding the length of time a primed dialysis system can be considered safe for use should consider all of these factors. It may not be possible to create experimental situations in which all relevant factors leading to high quality of primed saline can replicate any one actual experience in a hemodialysis unit. However, practices that decrease the probability of bacterial contamination of priming saline or dialysate can help prevent adverse patient responses. Considering the limited evidence about reasons for thrombosis of blood in dialysis systems, very few conclusions can be drawn about the safety of infusing recirculated blood. The possible interactions of the dialysis system and individual physiological factors are limitless and are probably impossible to predict. The available literature identifies that the coagulation process begins immediately as blood interacts with the dialyzer and can be exacerbated if complement is activated. Combining this probability with the effects of possible pyrogen exposure, it is safe to say that considerable risk may exist the longer blood in the extracorporeal system is recirculated. Weighing these risks with the possible benefits of returning recirculated blood to a person on hemodialysis must be an individual decision each time the situation presents itself.
机译:毫不奇怪,没有任何证据支持血液透析中安全输注循环盐水或血液的标准。许多因素会影响再循环盐水的细菌学和热原质量,以及个人对最终产品的生理反应。准备透析回路时,请注意严格的无菌操作,透析液的细菌质量,所用透析器的特性以及对内毒素存在的个体生理反应,这在被透析的个体是否经历热原反应中都起着一定的作用。由于导管腔内细菌继续生长的可能性,那些依赖于通过导管通路进行慢性血液透析的患者可能特别脆弱。应考虑所有这些因素,关于可以考虑使用预处理透析系统的时间长度的单位政策。可能无法创建实验情况,在这些情况下导致高质量底液的所有相关因素都可以在血液透析设备中复制任何一种实际经验。但是,降低细菌被灌注生理盐水或透析液污染的可能性的做法可以帮助预防患者的不良反应。考虑到有关透析系统中血栓形成原因的有限证据,关于输注循环血安全性的结论很少。透析系统与各个生理因素的可能相互作用是无限的,可能无法预测。现有文献表明,血液与透析器相互作用时,凝血过程立即开始,如果补体被激活,则凝血过程会加剧。结合这种可能性和可能接触热原的影响,可以肯定地说,如果体外系统中的血液循环更长,则可能存在相当大的风险。每次情况出现时,权衡这些风险以及将血液循环回血液透析的可能益处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号