...
首页> 外文期刊>Nature clinical practice. Nephrology >Comparing the efficacy of intravenous iron and oral iron in nondialysis patients with chronic kidney disease.
【24h】

Comparing the efficacy of intravenous iron and oral iron in nondialysis patients with chronic kidney disease.

机译:比较静脉铁剂和口服铁剂在慢性肾脏病非透析患者中​​的疗效。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This Practice Point commentary discusses the findings and limitations of a phase III trial by Spinowitz et al. that compared oral and intravenous iron therapies in nondialysis patients with chronic kidney disease. In total, 304 patients were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive either two 510 mg doses of intravenous ferumoxytol within 5+/-3 days or 200mg of elemental oral iron daily for 21 days. At day 35, hemoglobin levels had increased significantly more in patients who had received intravenous ferumoxytol than in those who had received oral iron therapy. Ferumoxytol was well tolerated. The superiority of ferumoxytol over other intravenous iron preparations, however, needs to be investigated, and optimal serum ferritin levels for the nondialysis CKD population need to be defined.
机译:该实践要点评论讨论了Spinowitz等人进行的III期试验的发现和局限性。比较了非透析慢性肾脏病患者的口服和静脉铁疗法。总共304例患者以3:1的比例被随机分配,在5 +/- 3天内接受两次510 mg剂量的静脉内阿魏酸或21天每天接受200 mg元素口服铁。在第35天,接受静脉内阿魏酸治疗的患者血红蛋白水平明显高于接受口服铁疗法的患者。阿魏酸的耐受性良好。然而,需要研究阿魏木酚比其他静脉注射铁制剂的优越性,并且需要确定非透析CKD人群的最佳血清铁蛋白水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号