首页> 外文期刊>Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology >Pegylated interferons alpha2a and alpha2b in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C.
【24h】

Pegylated interferons alpha2a and alpha2b in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C.

机译:聚乙二醇化干扰素α2a和α2b在慢性丙型肝炎的治疗中。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Chronic infection with HCV has an estimated prevalence of 1.6-2.0% worldwide and is a major cause of liver-related death. The first attempts to halt the progression of infection relied on the empirical use of interferon (IFN), a naturally occurring cytokine that is implicated in antiviral innate immunity. The first studies of this treatment in the early 1990s, however, led to disappointing response rates. These response rates subsequently improved with the empirical addition of the guanosine analog ribavirin to the treatment regimen. To improve the effectiveness and tolerability of the three times per week therapeutic schedule of IFN, two forms of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) were developed in the early 2000s-PEG-IFN-alpha2a and PEG-IFN-alpha2b. These two compounds differ markedly in size, structure, site of attachment of the polyethylene glycol moiety and type of bond involved in pegylation, which ultimately confer different pharmacokinetics and biological activity. Unsurprisingly, researchers question whether the two PEG-IFNs also differ in clinical effectiveness, but the re-analysis of restrospective studies and the results of three head-to-head studies have left this issue open. We have, therefore, scrutinized the design and conduct of all available studies to unravel the reasons behind the therapeutic differences between PEG-IFN-alpha2a and PEG-IFN-alpha2b.
机译:据估计,慢性HCV感染在全球范围内的患病率为1.6-2.0%,是肝脏相关死亡的主要原因。阻止感染进程的第一个尝试依赖于干扰素(IFN)的经验使用,干扰素是一种天然存在的细胞因子,与抗病毒先天免疫有关。然而,在1990年代初期对这种疗法的首次研究导致令人失望的反应率。随后通过经验性将鸟苷类似物利巴韦林添加到治疗方案中,改善了这些应答率。为了提高每周3次IFN治疗方案的有效性和耐受性,在2000年代初期开发了两种形式的聚乙二醇化干扰素(PEG-IFN)-PEG-IFN-α2a和PEG-IFN-α2b。这两种化合物在大小,结构,聚乙二醇部分的连接位点以及聚乙二醇化中涉及的键的类型上有明显不同,这最终赋予了不同的药代动力学和生物学活性。毫不奇怪,研究人员质疑这两种PEG-IFN在临床有效性上是否也有所不同,但是对回顾性研究的重新分析以及三项面对面研究的结果使这一问题悬而未决。因此,我们已经仔细研究了所有可用研究的设计和进行,以阐明PEG-IFN-α2a和PEG-IFN-α2b之间治疗差异的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号