首页> 外文期刊>Natural Gas and Electricity. >Supremes Affirm Supremacy Clause but Point Out Alternatives for States
【24h】

Supremes Affirm Supremacy Clause but Point Out Alternatives for States

机译:最高法院确认至高无上的条款,但指出国家的替代方案

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Participants in the energy sector know full well that they have been very much in the public spotlight these days, what with the price of oil, calls for renewable energy, and so form. But the energy sector should also know that no less an authority than the US Supreme Court has recently been paying a great deal of attention to the business of energy, particularly as to who may regulate it. Readers shall recall that not long ago in these pages we reviewed recent Court decisions sharply drawing the line between federal and state oversight of the natural gas and electricity industries, respectively. First, the Oneok decision exemplified the principle of federal supremacy over the interstate component of the natural gas industry, as first brought about by Congress with the promulgation of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), while simultaneously leaving intact state authority over predominantly local matters. Oneok was soon followed by EPSA, which reached the parallel conclusion that the interstate electricity market was likewise subject to the supremacy of federal law, as embodied in the Federal Power Act (FPA).
机译:能源行业的参与者非常清楚,他们如今已成为公众关注的焦点,石油价格,对可再生能源的需求等等。但是,能源部门还应该知道,与美国最高法院一样,权力机构最近一直在高度关注能源业务,尤其是谁来监管能源业务。读者应该记得,不久之前,在这些页面中,我们回顾了法院最近的判决,从而清晰地划出了联邦和州对天然气和电力行业进行监督的界限。首先,奥诺克(Oneok)决定体现了联邦对天然气行业州际组成部分至高无上的原则,这是国会在颁布《天然气法》(NGA)时首先提出的,同时保留了完整的州政府对主要地方事务的权力。 Oneok紧随其后的是EPSA,它得出了一个平行的结论,即州际电力市场同样也受制于《联邦电力法》​​(FPA)所体现的联邦法律的至高无上。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号