首页> 外文期刊>Microbial Biotechnology >Molecular biomass and MetaTaxogenomic assessment of soil microbial communities as influenced by soil DNA extraction procedure
【24h】

Molecular biomass and MetaTaxogenomic assessment of soil microbial communities as influenced by soil DNA extraction procedure

机译:土壤DNA提取程序对土壤微生物群落的分子生物量和MetaTaxo基因组学评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Three soil DNA extraction procedures (homemade protocols and commercial kit) varying in their practicability were applied to contrasting soils to evaluate their efficiency in recovering: (i) soil DNA and (ii) bacterial diversity estimated by 16S rDNA pyrosequencing. Significant differences in DNA yield were systematically observed between tested procedures. For certain soils, 10 times more DNA was recovered with one protocol than with the others. About 15 000 sequences of 16S rDNA were obtained for each sample which were clustered to draw rarefaction curves. These curves, as well as the PCA ordination of community composition based on OTU clustering, did not reveal any significant difference between procedures. Nevertheless, significant differences between procedures were highlighted by the taxonomic identification of sequences obtained at the phylum to genus levels. Depending on the soil, differences in the number of genera detected ranged from 1% to 26% between the most and least efficient procedures, mainly due to a poorer capacity to recover populations belonging to Actinobacteria, Firmicutes or Crenarchaeota. This study enabled us to rank the relative efficiencies of protocols for their recovery of soil molecular microbial biomass and bacterial diversity and to help choosing an appropriate soil DNA extraction procedure adapted to novel sequencing technologies.
机译:三种不同实用性的土壤DNA提取程序(自制规程和商业试剂盒)用于对比土壤,以评估其回收效率:(i)土壤DNA和(ii)通过16S rDNA焦磷酸测序法估算的细菌多样性。在测试步骤之间系统地观察到DNA产量的显着差异。对于某些土壤,一种方案回收的DNA比其他方案多10倍。每个样品获得约15000个16S rDNA序列,将其聚类以绘制稀疏曲线。这些曲线以及基于OTU聚类的社区组成的PCA排序都没有揭示程序之间的任何显着差异。然而,分类鉴定从门到属水平获得的序列突出了程序之间的显着差异。根据土壤的不同,最有效的方法和最不有效的方法之间检测到的属数差异在1%到26%之间,这主要是由于恢复放线菌,硬毛纲或Crenarchaeota种群的能力较差。这项研究使我们能够对回收土壤分子微生物生物量和细菌多样性的方案的相对效率进行排名,并帮助选择适合于新型测序技术的合适土壤DNA提取程序。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号