...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer: A Journal of the American Cancer Society >Does the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for endometrial cancer lead to increased discrimination in patient outcomes?
【24h】

Does the revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for endometrial cancer lead to increased discrimination in patient outcomes?

机译:修订后的国际妇产科联合会用于子宫内膜癌的分期系统是否会导致患者预后的增加?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Recent changes were made to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system for endometrial cancer. The objective of this study was to compare survival outcomes for patients who were staged according to the 1988 FIGO staging system versus the 2009 FIGO staging system. METHODS: Data were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program for the years 1998 to 2006. Patients who had a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the uterus with complete staging information were included. Patients were staged according to the 1988 and 2009 FIGO staging systems, and Kaplan-Meier estimates were derived for cause-specific survival (CSS). Univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify the factors associated with survival. RESULTS: In total, 47,284 patients were included. The median follow-up was 37 months. The 5-year CSS rates for patients who had 2009 FIGO stage IA and IB disease were 96.6% and 89.9%, respectively (P < .0001). After accounting for age, grade, and race, this survival difference remained significant (hazard ratio [HR], 1.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.74-2.24; P < .0001). Patients who had 1988 FIGO stage IIA disease had a 5-year CSS rate similar to that of patients who had 1988 FIGO stage IC disease (88.6% vs 89.9%, respectively; P = .09). Patients who had positive pelvic washings had a 5-year CSS rate similar to that of patients who had stage IIIA disease according to the 2009 FIGO system (74.2% vs 72.1%, respectively; P = .37). The 5-year CSS rate for patients who had stage IIIC1 disease was significantly improved compared with that for patients who had stage IIIC2 disease (68.2% vs 57.3%, respectively; P < .0001). In the multivariate model, the survival difference remained (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.26-1.76; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The 2009 staging system for endometrial cancer produced better discrimination in CSS outcomes compared with the 1988 system.
机译:背景:最近对国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)子宫内膜癌分期系统进行了更改。本研究的目的是比较根据1988 FIGO分期系统与2009 FIGO分期系统分期的患者的生存结局。方法:数据来自1998年至2006年的监测,流行病学和最终结果计划。包括诊断为子宫腺癌且具有完整分期信息的患者。根据1988年和2009年FIGO分期系统对患者进行了分期,并得出了Kaplan-Meier估计的原因特异性存活率(CSS)。使用Cox比例风险模型进行单因素和多因素分析,以确定与生存相关的因素。结果:总共纳入47284例患者。中位随访时间为37个月。 2009年FIGO IA和IB期患者的5年CSS发生率分别为96.6%和89.9%(P <.0001)。在考虑了年龄,等级和种族之后,该生存差异仍然很明显(危险比[HR]为1.97; 95%置信区间[CI]为1.74-2.24; P <.0001)。患有1988 FIGO阶段IIA病的患者的5年CSS发生率与1988 FIGO阶段IC病的患者相似(分别为88.6%和89.9%; P = .09)。盆腔冲洗阳性的患者的5年CSS发生率与根据2009 FIGO系统发生IIIA期疾病的患者相似(分别为74.2%和72.1%; P = 0.37)。与IIIC2期患者相比,IIIC1期患者的5年CSS率显着提高(分别为68.2%和57.3%; P <.0001)。在多变量模型中,存活率差异仍然存在(HR,1.49; 95%CI,1.26-1.76; P <.0001)。结论:与1988年系统相比,2009年子宫内膜癌分期系统在CSS结局方面产生了更好的区别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号