首页> 外文期刊>Cancer: A Journal of the American Cancer Society >Influence of family history and preventive health behaviors on colorectal cancer screening in African Americans.
【24h】

Influence of family history and preventive health behaviors on colorectal cancer screening in African Americans.

机译:家族史和预防性健康行为对非裔美国人大肠癌筛查的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND.: African Americans (AAs) have low rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. To the authors' knowledge, factors that influence their participation, especially individuals with a family history of CRC ("family history"), are not well understood. METHODS.: A secondary analysis of the 2002 Maryland Cancer Survey data examined predictors of risk-appropriate, timely CRC screening ("screening") in AAs with a family history and in individuals without a family history. Predictors that were evaluated included age, sex, family history, mammogram or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening, body mass index, activity, fruit/vegetable consumption, alcohol, smoking, perceived risk of cancer, education, employment, insurance, access to a healthcare provider, and healthcare provider recommendation of fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and/or sigmoidoscopy/colonoscopy. RESULTS.: In individuals without a family history of CRC (N = 492), recommendation for FOBT (odds ratio [OR] of 11.90; 95% confidence interval[95% CI], 6.84-20.71) and sigmoidoscopy/colonscopy (OR of 7.06; 95% CI, 4.11-12.14), moderate/vigorous activity (OR of 1.74; 95% CI, 1.06-2.28), and PSA screening history (OR of 2.68; 95% CI, 1.01-7.81) were found to be predictive of screening. In individuals with a family history (N = 88), recommendation for sigmoidoscopy/colonscopy (OR of 24.3; 95%, CI 5.30-111.34) and vigorous activity (OR of 5.21; 95% CI, 1.09-24.88) were found to be predictive of screening. However, family history did not predict screening when the analysis was controlled for age, education, and insurance. AAs who had a family history were less likely to screen compared with their white counterparts (N = 293) and compared with AAs who were at average risk for CRC (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS.: Regardless of family history, healthcare provider recommendation and activity level were important predictors of screening. Lower screening rates were observed in AAs who had a family history compared with individuals who did not. The authors believe that, for AAs who have a family history, further examination of barriers and facilitators to CRC screening within the cultural context is warranted. Cancer 2008. (c) 2008 American Cancer Society.
机译:背景:非洲裔美国人(AAs)的大肠癌(CRC)筛查率较低。据作者所知,影响他们参与的因素,特别是具有CRC家族病史(“家族史”)的人,尚不为人所知。方法:对2002年马里兰州癌症调查数据的辅助分析检查了有家族史的AA和无家族史的个体中,进行风险适当,及时CRC筛查(“筛查”)的预测因子。被评估的预测因素包括年龄,性别,家族病史,乳房X线照片或前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)筛查,体重指数,活动,水果/蔬菜消费,酒精,吸烟,癌症风险,教育,就业,保险,出入途径向医疗保健提供者,以及医疗保健提供者推荐粪便潜血测试(FOBT)和/或乙状结肠镜/结肠镜检查。结果:在无CRC家族史的患者(N = 492)中,推荐使用FOBT(比值比[OR]为11.90; 95%置信区间[95%CI],6.84-20.71)和乙状结肠镜/结肠镜检查(OR为发现7.06; 95%CI,4.11-12.14),中等/剧烈活动(OR为1.74; 95%CI,1.06-2.28)和PSA筛查史(OR为2.68; 95%CI,1.01-7.81)预测筛查。在有家族史(N = 88)的个体中,建议进行乙状结肠镜/结肠镜检查(OR为24.3; 95%,CI 5.30-111.34)和活动活跃(OR为5.21; 95%CI,1.09-24.88)。预测筛查。但是,如果对年龄,教育程度和保险进行了分析,则家族史不能预测筛查的准确性。具有家族病史的AA与白人相比(N = 293)和具有CRC的平均风险的AA相比,筛查的可能性较小(P <.05)。结论:无论家族史如何,医疗保健提供者的建议和活动水平都是筛查的重要预测指标。与没有家族史的AA相比,有家族史的AA的筛查率较低。作者认为,对于具有家族史的AA,有必要在文化背景下进一步检查CRC筛查的障碍和促进因素。癌症2008。(c)2008美国癌症协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号