...
首页> 外文期刊>Cancer: A Journal of the American Cancer Society >A multisite, community oncology-based randomized trial of a brief educational intervention to increase communication regarding complementary and alternative medicine
【24h】

A multisite, community oncology-based randomized trial of a brief educational intervention to increase communication regarding complementary and alternative medicine

机译:一项基于社区肿瘤的多地点随机教育试验,旨在进行简短的教育干预,以增加有关补充和替代医学的交流

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is widespread, yet there is relatively little discussion regarding its use between oncology patients and their health care practitioners. METHODS This multisite randomized trial examined the efficacy of an educational intervention designed to encourage oncology nurses to discuss CAM use with their patients. A total of 175 nurses completed questionnaires about discussing CAM use with patients at baseline and 2 months after the intervention. Patients at baseline (N = 699) and different patients at follow-up (N = 650) completed questionnaires regarding CAM. RESULTS At the 2-month follow-up, nurses in the intervention reported they were more likely to ask about CAM use than those in the control group (odds ratio, 4.2; P =.005). However, no significant effect was found for the percentage of patients who indicated that they were asked about CAM use (odds ratio, 2.1; P >.10). Approximately 40% of patients reported using CAM after their cancer diagnosis, yet the majority of nurses estimated that < 25% of their patients were using CAM. CONCLUSIONS CAM use in community-based oncology patients is common and is underestimated by oncology nurses. The brief, low-intensity intervention presented herein was found to be sufficiently powerful to change nurses' perceptions of their behavior but may not have been intensive enough to yield changes that were evident to patients. Cancer 2013;119:3514-3522.
机译:背景技术补充和替代医学(CAM)的使用是广泛的,但是关于肿瘤学患者与其医疗保健从业者之间的使用的讨论相对较少。方法这项多地点随机试验检查了旨在鼓励肿瘤科护士与患者讨论CAM使用情况的教育干预措施的功效。共有175名护士完成了有关在基线和干预后2个月与患者讨论CAM使用情况的问卷。基线时(N = 699)的患者和随访时(N = 650)的不同患者完成了有关CAM的调查问卷。结果在为期2个月的随访中,干预组的护士报告说,与对照组相比,他们询问CAM使用的可能性更高(优势比为4.2; P = .005)。但是,对于表示被问及使用CAM的患者百分比没有显着影响(优势比为2.1; P> .10)。大约40%的患者在癌症诊断后报告使用CAM,但是大多数护士估计不到25%的患者使用CAM。结论在社区肿瘤患者中使用CAM很普遍,并且被肿瘤护士低估了。发现本文介绍的简短,低强度的干预措施足以改变护士对其行为的看法,但强度不足以产生对患者明显的变化。癌症2013; 119:3514-3522。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号