首页> 外文期刊>Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology >Neglected biological patterns in the residualsA behavioural ecologist’s guide to co-operating with heteroscedasticity
【24h】

Neglected biological patterns in the residualsA behavioural ecologist’s guide to co-operating with heteroscedasticity

机译:残留物中被忽略的生物学模式行为生态学家与异方差合作的指南

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

One of the fundamental assumptions underlying linear regression models is that the errors have a constant variance (i.e., homoscedastic). When this assumption is violated, standard errors from a regression can be biased and inconsistent, meaning thatthe associated p values and 95% confidence intervals cannot be trusted. The assumption of homoscedasticity is made for statistical reasons rather than biological reasons; in most real datasets, some form of heteroscedasticity is likely to exist. However,a survey of the behavioural ecology literature showed that only about 5% of articles explicitly mentioned heteroscedasticity, leaving 95% of articles in which heteroscedasticity was apparently absent. These results strongly indicate that the prevalenceof heteroscedasticity is widely under-reported within behavioural ecology. The aim of this article is to raise awareness of heteroscedasticity amongst behavioural ecologists. Using topical examples from fields in behavioural ecology such as sexual dimorphism and animal personality, we highlight the biological importance of considering heteroscedasticity. We also emphasize that researchers should pay closer attention to the variance in their data and consider what factors could cause heteroscedasticity.In addition, we introduce some simple methods of dealing with heteroscedasticity. The two methods we focus on are: (1) incorporating variance functions within a generalised least squares (GLS) framework to model the functional form of heteroscedasticityand; (2) heteroscedasticity-consistent standard error (HCSE) estimators, which can be used when the functional form of heteroscedasticity is unknown. Using case studies, we show how both methods can influence the output from linear regression models. Finally, we hope that more researchers will consider heteroscedasticity as an important source of additional information about the particular biological process being studied, rather than an impediment to statistical analysis.
机译:线性回归模型所基于的基本假设之一是误差具有恒定的方差(即,均方差)。当违反此假设时,来自回归的标准误差可能会有偏差且不一致,这意味着关联的p值和95%置信区间不能被信任。假设同构性是出于统计原因而非生物学原因。在大多数真实数据集中,可能存在某种形式的异方差性。但是,对行为生态学文献的调查显示,只有约5%的文章明确提到了异方差,而95%的文章中显然没有异方差。这些结果强烈表明,异方差的普遍性在行为生态学中被广泛报道。本文旨在提高行为生态学家对异方差性的认识。使用行为生态学领域的主题示例,例如性二态性和动物性格,我们强调了考虑异方差性的生物学重要性。我们还强调指出,研究人员应密切注意数据差异,并考虑哪些因素可能导致异方差性。此外,我们介绍了一些处理异方差性的简单方法。我们关注的两种方法是:(1)将方差函数合并到广义最小二乘(GLS)框架中,以建模异方差的功能形式; (2)异方差一致的标准误差(HCSE)估计量,当异方差的功能形式未知时可以使用。通过案例研究,我们展示了这两种方法如何影响线性回归模型的输出。最后,我们希望更多的研究者将异方差性视为正在研究的特定生物学过程的其他信息的重要来源,而不是阻碍统计分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号