首页> 外文期刊>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA >Surgical management of osteochondritis dissecans of the knee in the paediatric population: A systematic review addressing surgical techniques
【24h】

Surgical management of osteochondritis dissecans of the knee in the paediatric population: A systematic review addressing surgical techniques

机译:儿科人群膝骨分离性骨软骨炎的外科手术治疗:涉及外科技术的系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: Several case series have been published exploring a variety of surgical treatments for osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) in patients 18 years and younger, but a systematic review is currently lacking. This systemic review identifies the various surgical techniques reported in the literature for treating OCD and assesses the effectiveness of these treatments based on functional outcomes and radiographic healing. Methods: A search of the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases was performed to identify clinical studies reporting outcomes of surgical management of OCD in the knee. A quality assessment of the included articles was conducted independently by 2 reviewers using a quality assessment tool developed by Yang et al. Results: A total of 25 papers including 470 patients aged ≤18 years (516 lesions) met the eligibility criteria and were reviewed. Surgical techniques for stable lesions included (arthroscopic and open) transarticular drilling, either alone (41 %) or with bioabsorbable pin fixation (3 %), extra-articular drilling (29 %) and fixation with bioabsorbable screws (4 %) or bone pegs (4 %). For unstable lesions, surgical techniques included (arthroscopic and open) fixation with bioabsorbable pins (9 %), metal screws (4 %), bone pegs (4 %), osteochondral plugs (3 %) or bioabsorbable screws (2 %), as well as transarticular drilling with bioabsorbable pin fixation (3 %) and drilling with metal screw fixation (2 %). Conclusion: The most common techniques were transarticular drilling for stable lesions and bioabsorbable pin fixation for unstable lesions. The key findings were that the vast majority of lesions healed postoperatively, regardless of technique, and that high-quality trials are required to more appropriately compare the effectiveness of techniques. Level of evidence: Systematic review, Level IV.
机译:目的:已经发表了多个病例系列,探讨了18岁及以下患者的各种解剖性骨软骨炎(OCD)的手术治疗方法,但目前尚缺乏系统的评价。这项系统的综述确定了文献中报道的各种用于治疗强迫症的手术技术,并根据功能结果和影像学愈合来评估这些疗法的有效性。方法:对EMBASE和MEDLINE数据库进行搜索,以鉴定报告膝盖OCD外科治疗结果的临床研究。由2位审稿人使用Yang等人开发的质量评估工具对所包含文章的质量进行独立评估。结果:共纳入25篇论文,包括470名≤18岁的患者(516个病灶)符合入选标准并进行了审查。稳定病变的外科手术技术包括(关节镜和开放式)经关节钻孔,单独(41%)或采用生物可吸收的销钉固定(3%),关节外钻孔(29%),并用生物可吸收的螺钉固定(4%)或骨钉固定(4%)。对于不稳定的病变,外科手术技术包括(可通过关节镜和开放式)生物可吸收销钉(9%),金属螺钉(4%),骨钉(4%),骨软骨栓(3%)或生物可吸收螺钉(2%)固定。以及采用生物可吸收销钉固定的经关节钻孔(3%)和采用金属螺钉固定的钻孔(2%)。结论:最常见的技术是经皮穿刺钻孔用于稳定病变,而生物可吸收的销钉固定术用于不稳定病变。关键发现是,无论采用何种技术,绝大多数病变术后均可治愈,并且需要进行高质量的试验才能更恰当地比较技术的有效性。证据级别:系统审查,级别IV。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号