首页> 外文期刊>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA >Operative management of the medial collateral ligament in the multi-ligament injured knee: an evidence-based systematic review.
【24h】

Operative management of the medial collateral ligament in the multi-ligament injured knee: an evidence-based systematic review.

机译:多韧带损伤膝关节内侧副韧带的手术管理:基于证据的系统评价。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

While it is generally accepted that most partial and isolated medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries can be treated non-operatively, ideal treatment of the MCL in multi-ligament knee injuries remains controversial. High failure rates with repair of the posterolateral corner in the multi-ligament injured knee have been recently reported, favoring reconstruction instead. The same maybe true for MCL injuries, however evidence-based treatment recommendations are lacking in the current orthopedic literature. The purpose of this study was to perform an evidence-based systematic review of the operative management (repair and/or reconstruction) of the MCL in the setting of multi-ligament knee injuries. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE and the Cochrane databases for all relevant articles published in English from 1978 to 2008 on the outcomes of surgical management (repair and/or reconstruction) of the MCL in the setting of combined ligament injuries was performed. Inclusion criteria included articles published in (1) English, (2) on human subjects, (3) between the years of 1978 and 2008, (4) had minimum 12-month follow-up, with a mean of at least 24 months, (5) on surgical management of MCL injuries, (6) associated with multi-ligament injuries (three or more ligaments) and/or knee dislocation, and (7) reported objective outcome data on the respective patient cohorts. Exclusion criteria consisted of technique papers, case reports, studies that included fractures associated with MCL injury and those that included pediatric patients. The review identified eight relevant studies. Five articles focused on MCL repair, while three articles focused on MCL reconstruction. No prospective studies compared MCL repair or reconstruction with non-operative treatment or directly compared MCL reconstruction with MCL repair. Currently there is a paucity of objective data on the outcomes regarding surgical management of MCL tears in the combined ligament injured knee. This systematic review demonstrated satisfactory results in both repair and reconstruction groups. Future objective outcome-based studies as well as comparative studies are needed to further evaluate the optimal treatment modality before evidence-based recommendations can be made. Therefore, individual treatment decisions for each patient should be based on the characteristics and nature of the injury.
机译:虽然大多数非局部内侧副韧带(MCL)损伤可以通过手术治疗得到公认,但在多韧带膝关节损伤中对MCL的理想治疗仍存在争议。最近报道了多韧带损伤的膝关节后外侧角修复的高失败率,而有利于重建。对于MCL损伤也可能如此,但是在当前的骨科文献中缺乏循证治疗的建议。这项研究的目的是在多韧带膝关节损伤的情况下对MCL的手术管理(修复和/或重建)进行循证的系统评价。对MEDLINE和Cochrane数据库进行了全面搜索,搜索了1978年至2008年间英文版有关韧带合并损伤的MCL的手术治疗(修复和/或重建)结果的所有相关英文出版物。纳入标准包括以(1)英文,(2)有关人类主题的文章,(3)1978年至2008年之间的文章,(4)至少12个月的随访,平均至少24个月, (5)关于MCL损伤的外科治疗,(6)与多韧带损伤(三个或更多韧带)和/或膝关节脱位有关,(7)报告了有关各个患者队列的客观结果数据。排除标准包括技术论文,病例报告,包括与MCL损伤相关的骨折的研究以及包括儿科患者的研究。审查确定了八项相关研究。五篇文章关注MCL修复,三篇文章关注MCL重建。没有前瞻性研究将MCL修复或重建与非手术治疗进行比较,或将MCL重建与MCL修复进行直接比较。目前,关于合并韧带损伤的膝盖中MCL撕裂的外科治疗的客观结果还很少。这项系统评价显示,修复组和重建组均获得令人满意的结果。在可以提出循证推荐之前,需要进一步的基于客观结果的研究以及比较研究,以进一步评估最佳治疗方式。因此,针对每个患者的个体治疗决策应基于损伤的特征和性质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号