首页> 外文期刊>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA >The impact of a high tibial valgus osteotomy and unicondylar medial arthroplasty on the treatment for knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis
【24h】

The impact of a high tibial valgus osteotomy and unicondylar medial arthroplasty on the treatment for knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis

机译:胫骨外翻截骨术和单icon内侧关节置换术对膝关节骨关节炎治疗的影响:一项荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: Both high tibial valgus osteotomy (HTO) and unicompartmental medial knee arthroplasty (UKA) are established methods for the treatment for moderate stages of OA. This is the first global meta-analysis to compare the long-term effects of both methods regarding survival, outcomes and complications of total arthroplasty. Methods: Literature research was performed using established medical databases: MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE (via OVID) and the Cochrane register. Criteria for inclusion were as follows: English or German papers, a clinical trial with a clear description of survival, an outcome evaluation using a well-described knee score and a follow-up >5 years. Statistical analysis was performed using the special meta-analysis software called "Comprehensive Meta Analysis" (version 2. 0; Biostat, Englewood, NJ, USA). Results: Final meta-analysis after the full-text review included 46 studies about valgus HTO and 43 studies about medial UKA. There were no significant differences between valgus HTO and medial UKA in terms of the number of total required replacements. After a 5- to 8-year follow-up, 91. 0% of the valgus HTO patients and 91. 5% of medial UKA patients did not need a total replacement. This value was 84. 4% for valgus HTOs and 86. 9% for medial UKAs after a 9- to 12-year follow-up. Mean survival time to TKA was 9. 7 years after valgus HTO and 9. 2 years after medial UKA. Clinical outcome was significantly better after medial UKA in a 5- to 12-year follow-up. After more than 12 years, results were comparable in both groups. No significant differences were seen in the complication rates. Conclusions: This meta-analysis aimed to find the advantages and disadvantages of two established methods for the treatment for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Valgus HTO is more appropriate for younger patients who accept a slight decrease in their physical activity. Medial UKA is appropriate for older patients obtaining sufficient pain relief but with reduced physical activity. Level of evidence: II.
机译:目的:胫骨外翻截骨术(HTO)和单室内侧膝关节置换术(UKA)都是治疗中度OA的既定方法。这是第一个比较这两种方法在全关节置换术的存活率,预后和并发症方面的长期效果的全球荟萃分析。方法:使用已建立的医学数据库进行文献研究:MEDLINE(通过PubMed),EMBASE(通过OVID)和Cochrane寄存器。纳入标准如下:英文或德文论文,清楚描述生存情况的临床试验,使用描述明确的膝关节评分进行结局评估以及随访> 5年。使用称为“综合性元分析”的特殊荟萃分析软件(版本2. 0; Biostat,Englewood,NJ,美国)进行统计分析。结果:全文审查后的最终荟萃分析包括46项有关外翻HTO的研究和43项有关内侧UKA的研究。外翻HTO和内侧UKA之间在总替换量方面无显着差异。经过5到8年的随访,不需要完全置换的患者为91. 0%的外翻HTO患者和91. 5%的UKA内侧患者。在进行了9至12年的随访后,外翻HTO的这一值为84. 4%,内侧UKA的为86. 9%。外翻HTO后平均TKA生存时间为9. 7年,内侧UKA后为9. 2年。在UKA内侧进行5至12年的随访后,临床结果明显好转。超过12年后,两组的结果均相当。并发症发生率无明显差异。结论:本荟萃分析旨在发现两种已建立的治疗内侧腔室膝骨关节炎的方法的优缺点。 Valgus HTO更适合那些身体活动略有下降的年轻患者。 UKA内侧适用于获得足够疼痛缓解但运动量减少的老年患者。证据级别:II。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号