...
首页> 外文期刊>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA >Double-bundle ACL reconstruction demonstrated superior clinical stability to single-bundle ACL reconstruction: a matched-pairs analysis of instrumented tests of tibial anterior translation and internal rotation laxity.
【24h】

Double-bundle ACL reconstruction demonstrated superior clinical stability to single-bundle ACL reconstruction: a matched-pairs analysis of instrumented tests of tibial anterior translation and internal rotation laxity.

机译:双束ACL重建显示出优于单束ACL重建的临床稳定性:胫骨前平移和内旋松弛度的仪器测试的配对分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: To compare objective measures of in vivo joint laxity between patients treated with single-bundle (SB) or double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions. METHODS: Sixty-four patients matched by age, height, weight, and that had undergone unilateral SB or DB hamstring ACL reconstruction participated in this study. Bilateral anterior tibial translation (ATT) was recorded using the KT1000 arthrometer, and a robotic testing system was used to assess side-to-side differences in rotational characteristics. Each reconstruction was evaluated to determine how well it mimicked the anteroposterior (AP) and rotational biomechanics of the normal knee. A reconstruction was defined as mimicking the normal knee if ATT and internal rotation (IR) were within 3 mm and 3.5 degrees , respectively. RESULTS: Side-to-side differences in ATT were significantly higher for the SB group (2.2 +/- 1.4 mm) than the DB group (1.1 +/- 1.0 mm, P = 0.001). While relative side-to-side differences in IR did not differ between the SB (1.3 degrees ) and DB groups (1.1 degrees , P = 0.82), absolute IR differences were significantly less with the DB reconstruction (2.1 degrees vs. 4.7 degrees , P = 0.001). A significantly greater percentage of DB patients (81%, P = 0.0003) had both ATT and IR similar to the normal knee, compared to 34% of the SB patients; however, IKDC subjective scores did not differ between groups. Regardless of technique, patients with the greatest rotational laxity of their non-operative knee demonstrated significantly worse IKDC scores. CONCLUSION: DB reconstruction resulted in reduced side-to-side differences in both ATT and IR. The DB technique more consistently reproduced the biomechanical profile of the uninjured limb than did the SB technique without increasing the risk of over-constraining the knee.
机译:目的:比较接受单束(SB)或双束(DB)前交叉韧带(ACL)重建的患者体内关节松弛的客观指标。方法:64例年龄,身高,体重匹配且接受单侧SB或DB ham绳肌ACL重建的患者参加了本研究。使用KT1000关节流量计记录胫骨前胫骨平移(ATT),并使用机器人测试系统评估旋转特性的左右差异。评估每个重建,以确定其模仿正常膝盖的前后(AP)和旋转生物力学的程度。如果ATT和内部旋转(IR)分别在3 mm和3.5度以内,则将重建定义为模仿正常膝盖。结果:SB组(2.2 +/- 1.4 mm)的ATT左右差异显着高于DB组(1.1 +/- 1.0 mm,P = 0.001)。虽然SB(1.3度)和DB组(1.1度,P = 0.82)之间IR的相对左右差异没有差异,但DB重建时的绝对IR差异明显较小(2.1度vs. 4.7度, P = 0.001)。与SB患者的34%相比,DB患者的ATT和IR都与正常膝关节相似,明显更高(81%,P = 0.0003)。但是,IKDC主观评分在各组之间没有差异。无论采用哪种技术,非手术膝关节旋转松弛最大的患者的IKDC评分均明显较差。结论:DB重建导致ATT和IR的左右差异减小。与SB技术相比,DB技术更一致地再现了未受伤肢体的生物力学特征,而没有增加过分约束膝盖的风险。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号