首页> 外文期刊>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy: official journal of the ESSKA >Comparison of the bioabsorbable and metal screw fixation after ACL reconstruction with a hamstring autograft in MRI and clinical outcome: a prospective randomized study
【24h】

Comparison of the bioabsorbable and metal screw fixation after ACL reconstruction with a hamstring autograft in MRI and clinical outcome: a prospective randomized study

机译:MRI腿筋自体移植重建ACL后可生物吸收和金属螺钉固定的比较:一项前瞻性随机研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There has never been an MRI study of tunnel widening comparing bioabsorbable to metal screw fixation in autologous hamstring anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. We randomized 62 patients to hamstring ACL reconstruction with either a bioabsorbable (n = 31) or metal screw (n = 31) fixation. The evaluation methods were clinical examination, KT-1000 arthrometric measurement, the International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm scores, and MRI. There were no differences between the groups preoperatively. Fifty-five patients (89%) were available at a minimum of 2-year follow-up (range 24-36 months). There was tunnel widening in both groups, but the increase was significantly greater in the AP dimension of the femoral tunnel in the bioabsorbable screw group compared to metal group (P = 0.01). The tibial tunnels showed no intergroup difference. Ninety-four percent of the knees were normal or nearly normal according to the IKDC scores and the average Lysholm score was 91 with no intergroup difference. The follow-up AP tibial tunnel diameter was smaller with normal knee laxity compared to abnormal knee laxity. The graft failure rate in the bioabsorbable screw group was 23% (7/31 patients) and 6% (2/31 patients) in the metal screw group. The use of bioabsorbable screws resulted in more femoral tunnel widening, and more graft failures compared to metal screws. The tunnel widening in the tibia was associated with the knee laxity (P = 0.02).
机译:从未进行过MRI隧道拓宽的研究,未将生物吸收性与金属螺钉固定在自体腿筋前交叉韧带(ACL)重建中进行比较。我们将62例患者随机分为可生物吸收(n = 31)或金属螺钉(n = 31)固定,以限制ACL重建。评估方法为临床检查,KT-1000关节角度测量,国际膝关节文献委员会和Lysholm评分以及MRI。术前两组之间无差异。至少2年的随访(24-36个月)有55例患者(占89%)。两组均有隧道加宽,但与金属组相比,生物可吸收螺钉组股骨隧道的AP尺寸增加明显更大(P = 0.01)。胫骨隧道无组间差异。根据IKDC评分,百分之九十四的膝盖是正常或接近正常,平均Lysholm评分为91,两组之间无差异。膝关节松弛正常者的随访AP胫骨隧道直径小于异常膝关节松弛。可生物吸收螺钉组的移植失败率在金属螺钉组中为23%(7/31例)和6%(2/31患者)。与金属螺钉相比,使用可生物吸收的螺钉导致更多的股骨隧道加宽,并导致更多的移植失败。胫骨的隧道变宽与膝关节松弛有关(P = 0.02)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号