首页> 外文期刊>Cancer: A Journal of the American Cancer Society >The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Is it good or bad for oncology?
【24h】

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Is it good or bad for oncology?

机译:《患者保护和负担得起的医疗法案》:肿瘤学是好事还是坏事?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In a recent funny and telling segment on the Jimmy Kimmel Live show broadcast on October 1, 2013 entitled "Six of One: ObamaCare vs. The Affordable Care Act," people were asked about their preference for ObamaCare and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). Most believed that these were 2 different health care programs, and had strong preferences for or against one or the other, likely based on ideologic convictions rather than an understanding of the provisions of the ACA. When asked about details, nearly all the respondents favored the components of the ACA while still objecting to "ObamaCare." As the ACA is implemented, controversy continues to surround it, with strongly held opinions existing regarding its eventual effect on health care in the United States. Depending on the wording of questions, surveys have demonstrated that 40% to 60% of Americans remain opposed to it because they are either convinced that it offers too little or too much. Despite the strong opinions, there are significant gaps in the understanding of what the ACA provides or stands for. Reviewing the premises of the ACA may help to clarify its potential impact on our health care. We, the authors of this article, come from 2 states at the opposite ends of the health care spectrum: Massachusetts and Texas. The potential future of the ACA may be glimpsed through an assessment of the smaller-scale 2006 Massachusetts health care insurance reform law implemented by Governor Mitt Romney in April 2006. As a result of this law, citizens of Massachusetts now have affordable health insurance, with 99% of its residents covered. Approximately two-thirds of the state's adults say they support the reform. The program has tangible humane and economic benefits. It improves access to care. It increases people's ability to get jobs and children's ability to learn. It improves lives, provides peace of mind and economic security to families, increases productivity for large and small employers and for students, and (the bottom line) saves lives. It also creates jobs and contributes to the economic health of the state.
机译:在最近于2013年10月1日播放的吉米·金梅尔(Jimmy Kimmel)直播节目的有趣而有趣的部分中,人们被问及他们对《奥巴马医保》和《患者保护和负担得起的医疗法案》的偏爱。 (ACA)。大多数人认为这是两个不同的医疗保健计划,并且很可能赞成或反对一种或另一种,这可能是基于意识形态的信念,而不是基于对ACA条款的理解。当被问及细节时,几乎所有受访者都赞成ACA的组成部分,同时仍然反对“奥巴马医改”。随着ACA的实施,争议一直围绕着它,关于它最终对美国医疗保健的影响存在着强烈的意见。根据问题的措词,调查表明40%至60%的美国人仍然反对,因为他们坚信它所提供的内容太少或太多。尽管有强烈的意见,但对ACA提供或代表的内容的理解仍有很大差距。审查ACA的前提可能有助于阐明其对我们医疗保健的潜在影响。我们(本文的作者)来自两个州,分别位于马萨诸塞州和德克萨斯州。通过对2006年4月州长米特·罗姆尼(Mitt Romney)实施的规模较小的2006年马萨诸塞州医疗保险改革法的评估,可以窥见ACA的潜在前景。由于这项法律的结果,马萨诸塞州公民现在有了负担得起的健康保险,而且其居民中有99%受到了保障。该州大约三分之二的成年人说他们支持这项改革。该计划具有明显的人道和经济利益。它改善了获得护理的机会。它提高了人们获得工作的能力和儿童的学习能力。它改善了生活,为家庭提供了安心和经济安全,提高了大小雇主和学生的生产率,并且(底线)挽救了生命。它还创造了就业机会,并为国家的经济健康做出了贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号