首页> 外文期刊>Cancer: A Journal of the American Cancer Society >Assessment of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging (Sixth and Seventh Editions) for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With External Beam Radiotherapy and Comparison With the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Risk-Stratification Method
【24h】

Assessment of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging (Sixth and Seventh Editions) for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Treated With External Beam Radiotherapy and Comparison With the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Risk-Stratification Method

机译:美国癌症分期联合委员会(第六版和第七版)对使用外束放射疗法治疗的临床局限性前列腺癌的评估以及与国家综合癌症网络风险分层方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare the prognostic value of the sixth and seventh editions of the American Joint Cancer Committee (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual and the risk-stratification model of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). METHODS: Two-thousand four hundred twenty-nine men who received definitive radiotherapy with or without androgen-deprivation therapy (median follow-up, 74 months) were analyzed. RESULTS: There was a migration of stage II patients to stage I with AJCC seventh edition (stage I increased from 1% to 38%, and stage II decreased from 91% to 55%). One pair-wise comparison (4%) of Kaplan-Meier estimates of biochemical failure, distant metastasis, prostate cancer-specific survival, and overall survival between stages was statistically significant for the AJCC sixth edition. Conversely, 16 of 24 comparisons (67%) were significant for the AJCC seventh edition. With the NCCN risk-stratification model, 9 of 12 comparisons (75%) were significant. Concordance probability estimate (CPE) and standard error (SE) analysis indicated uniform and significant improvement in the predictive power of the AJCC seventh edition versus the sixth edition for all outcomes. CPE +/- SE values for the AJCC seventh edition versus the sixth edition were 0.51 +/- 0.009 versus 0.59 +/- 0.02, respectively, for biochemical failure; 0.54 +/- 0.02 versus 0.70 +/- 0.05, respectively, for distant metastasis; 0.57 +/- 0.009 versus 0.76 +/- 0.007, respectively, for prostate cancer-specific survival; and 0.52 +/- 0.006 versus 0.57 +/- 0.01, respectively, for overall survival. CPE +/- SE values for the NCCN model were 0.59 +/- 0.02 for biochemical failure, 0.72 +/- 0.05 for distant metastasis, 0.80 +/- 0.01 for prostate cancer-specific survival, and 0.57 +/- 0.01 for overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: The current results indicated that the seventh edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual is a major improvement over the sixth edition, because it distributes patients better among the stages and is more prognostic. However, the NCCN model was superior to the AJCC seventh edition and remains the preferred method for risk-based clinical management of prostate cancer with radiotherapy. Cancer 2012. (c) 2012 American Cancer Society.
机译:背景:这项研究的目的是比较第六版和第七版的美国联合癌症委员会(AJCC)癌症分期手册和国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)的风险分层模型的预后价值。方法:分析了249名接受或不接受雄激素剥夺治疗的明确放疗的男性(中位随访时间为74个月)。结果:AJCC第七版将II期患者迁移到I期(I期从1%增加到38%,II期从91%减少到55%)。对于AJCC第六版,Kaplan-Meier对生化衰竭,远处转移,前列腺癌特异性生存率和各个阶段之间的总生存率的成对比较(4%)具有统计学意义。相反,在AJCC第七版中,有24个比较中的16个(67%)是有意义的。使用NCCN风险分层模型,在12个比较中有9个(75%)是有意义的。一致性概率估计(CPE)和标准误差(SE)分析表明,对于所有结局,AJCC第七版相对于第六版的预测能力均获得了统一且显着的提高。对于生化衰竭,AJCC第七版与第六版的CPE +/- SE值分别为0.51 +/- 0.009与0.59 +/- 0.02;远处转移分别为0.54 +/- 0.02和0.70 +/- 0.05;前列腺癌特异性生存率分别为0.57 +/- 0.009和0.76 +/- 0.007;整体生存率分别为0.52 +/- 0.006和0.57 +/- 0.01。对于NCCN模型,CPE +/- SE值对于生化衰竭而言为0.59 +/- 0.02,对于远处转移而言为0.72 +/- 0.05,对于前列腺癌特异性生存期为0.80 +/- 0.01,对于整体生存期为0.57 +/- 0.01 。结论:目前的结果表明,第七版《 AJCC癌症分期手册》是对第六版的重大改进,因为它在各个阶段之间更好地分配了患者,并且预后更佳。但是,NCCN模型优于AJCC第七版,仍然是放射疗法基于风险的前列腺癌临床管理的首选方法。癌症2012。(c)2012美国癌症协会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号