...
【24h】

Rodent mutation assay data presentation and statistical assessment

机译:啮齿动物突变试验数据表示和统计评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Carr and Gorelick (1995) and Piegorsch et al. (1995) have discussed statistical aspects of study design and data interpretation for transgenic mouse mutation assays. In order to derive reliable data from these or any other assay it is obviously important to study known sources of variability and thereby to diminish or eliminate incorrect conclusions caused by chance or low assay power. It is perhaps equally important for somebody to admit that equations such as:taken from Carr and Gorelick (1995) mean little to most investigators or regulators. On the surface that probably does not mutter so long as the overall message regarding animal group sizes/plaque numbers etc. is accepted. However, it is not that simple.The elegance and complexity of the statistical equations shown in these two papers implies that the transgenic assays have well studied and regular sources of variability that have been precisely modelled. Our experience of these assays is not like that. We cannot pin down so convincingly the causes of the differences between apparently identical repeat experiments. Because of this we have adopted the conservative approach of representing our group data, as bar charts with standard deviations. When itseems as if an increase in mutant frequency has occurred in a test group, we conduct a repeat experiment using the same sample of DNA. If necessary, we also re-isolate DNA from the frozen tissue, or repeat the whole experiment. This means that at the present state of development of these assays in our laboratory we incorporate the study design advice of Piegorsch et al. (1995) and Carr and Gorelick (1995) but we look at the test data and require to be convinced by appropriate repeat experiments - we donot conduct statistical assessments of the data. What we are attempting to avoid is handing over responsibility for the assay outcome to a standard statistical package. This was not advised in either of the above two papers, but the trend to it was implicit, and it will happen when such assays are eventually accepted for regulatory use.
机译:Carr和Gorelick(1995)和Piegorsch等人。 (1995年)讨论了转基因小鼠突变试验研究设计和数据解释的统计方面。为了从这些或任何其他测定中获得可靠的数据,研究已知的变异性来源,从而减少或消除由偶然或较低的测定能力引起的错误结论,显然很重要。对于某些人来说,承认这样的等式也许同样重要:取自Carr and Gorelick(1995)的等式对大多数研究者或监管者而言意义不大。只要可以接受有关动物群大小/斑块数等的整体信息,表面上就不会喃喃自语。然而,这并不是那么简单。这两篇论文中所显示的统计方程式的优雅和复杂性,意味着对转基因检测方法进行了深入研究,并对可变性的常规来源进行了精确建模。我们在这些检测中的经验并非如此。我们不能如此令人信服地确定明显相同的重复实验之间差异的原因。因此,我们采用了保守的方法来表示组数据,即具有标准偏差的条形图。当似乎在测试组中发生了突变频率增加时,我们使用相同的DNA样本进行重复实验。如有必要,我们还可以从冰冻的组织中重新分离DNA,或重复整个实验。这意味着在我们实验室中这些测定法的发展现状下,我们纳入了Piegorsch等人的研究设计建议。 (1995)和Carr and Gorelick(1995),但我们要查看测试数据,并需要通过适当的重复实验来说服-我们不对数据进行统计评估。我们试图避免的是将测定结果的责任移交给标准统计软件包。以上两篇论文均未建议这样做,但趋势是隐含的,当最终将此类测定法用于监管用途时,这种情况就会发生。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号