首页> 外文期刊>Musculoskeletal care. >Effectiveness of an integrated outpatient care programme compared with present-day standard care in early rheumatoid arthritis.
【24h】

Effectiveness of an integrated outpatient care programme compared with present-day standard care in early rheumatoid arthritis.

机译:在早期类风湿关节炎中,与目前的标准护理相比,综合门诊护理计划的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effectiveness of an integrated care programme in daily practice compared with present-day standard care for ambulatory early rheumatoid arthritis patients. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, group A received programmed multidisciplinary outpatient care and group B standard rheumatologist-centred care. Demographics, disease duration, initial and actual treatment, disease activity (Disease Activity-28 Score), general health (Short Form-36 [SF-36]), functionality (Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]), coping style (Utrecht's Coping List), illness perception (Dutch-Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire) and satisfaction about care were recorded. RESULTS: Eight-nine patients were included in group A and 102 in group B. Demographics, rheumatoid factor, antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptides and disease duration were comparable. More patients in group A received initial combination therapy (35% versus 3%). Actual treatment regimens were comparable. More patients were in remission (69% versus 39%) or had low disease activity (80% versus 60%), mean HAQ-scores were lower (0.52 versus 0.80), more patients had no functional impairment (38% versus 15%) and SF-36 scores were higher in group A. Coping style and illness perception were similar, except for illness coherence. Satisfaction differed only for aspects typically favouring a care programme. Participation in a care programme independently predicted remission and absence of disability in a regression model, including gender and initial treatment as other predictors. CONCLUSION: Disease activity was better controlled and functionality and general health better preserved in patients following an outpatient care programme. This was partly due to the easier implementation of an intensive initial treatment strategy but apparently also to other aspects of organized pharmacological and non-pharmacological care, to be defined in randomized, controlled studies.
机译:目的:调查与早期标准类风湿关节炎患者日常护理相比,在日常实践中的综合护理计划的有效性。方法:在这项横断面研究中,A组接受了计划的多学科门诊治疗,B组接受了以风湿病学家为中心的标准治疗。人口统计学,疾病持续时间,初始和实际治疗,疾病活动(Disease Activity-28得分),总体健康(简短表格36 [SF-36]),功能(健康评估问卷[HAQ]),应对方式(乌得勒支的应对清单) ),疾病知觉(荷兰语修订的疾病知觉问卷)和对护理的满意度记录下来。结果:A组包括89例患者,B组包括102例。人口统计学,类风湿因子,抗环瓜氨酸肽抗体和疾病持续时间具有可比性。 A组中更多的患者接受了初始联合治疗(35%对3%)。实际治疗方案具有可比性。病情缓解的患者更多(69%比39%)或疾病活动程度低(80%比60%),平均HAQ评分更低(0.52比0.80),无功能障碍的患者更多(38%比15%)。 A组的SF-36评分较高。应对方式和疾病知觉相似,除了疾病的连贯性。满意度仅在通常偏爱护理计划的方面有所不同。参与护理计划可在回归模型中独立预测缓解和无残疾,包括性别和初始治疗等其他预测因素。结论:在门诊护理计划之后,患者的疾病活动得到了更好的控制,功能和整体健康得到了更好的保留。这部分是由于更容易实施强化的初始治疗策略,而且显然是由于在随机对照研究中定义的有组织药理和非药理治疗的其他方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号