...
首页> 外文期刊>Multivariate behavioral research >A systematic review of propensity score methods in the Social sciences
【24h】

A systematic review of propensity score methods in the Social sciences

机译:社会科学倾向评分方法的系统综述

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The use of propensity scores in psychological and educational research has been steadily increasing in the last 2 to 3 years. However, there are some common misconceptions about the use of different estimation techniques and condition-ing choices in the context of propensity score analysis. In addition, reporting practices for propensity score analyses often lack important details that allow other researchers to confidently judge the appropriateness of reported analyses and potentially to replicate published findings. In this article we conduct a systematic literature review of a large number of published articles in major areas of social science that used propensity scores up until the fall of 2009. We identify common errors in estimation, conditioning, and reporting of propensity score analyses and suggest possible solutions.
机译:在过去的2到3年中,倾向得分在心理和教育研究中的使用一直在稳定增长。但是,对于在倾向得分分析中使用不同的估算技术和条件选择存在一些普遍的误解。此外,倾向得分分析的报告实践通常缺乏重要的细节,这些细节使得其他研究人员可以自信地判断所报告分析的适当性,并有可能复制已发表的发现。在本文中,我们对社会科学主要领域中大量使用倾向得分的已发表文章进行了系统的文献综述,直到2009年秋季。我们确定了倾向得分分析的估计,调节和报告中的常见错误,并提出建议可能的解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号