...
首页> 外文期刊>Molecular physics >An evaluation of the modified 6-31G*basis set for the atoms Ga-Kr using the Gaussian-3 and Gaussian-4 composite methods
【24h】

An evaluation of the modified 6-31G*basis set for the atoms Ga-Kr using the Gaussian-3 and Gaussian-4 composite methods

机译:使用Gaussian-3和Gaussian-4复合方法对Ga-Kr原子的修改后的6-31G *基集进行评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The new modified 6-31G* basis set of Mitin and Merz for the elements Ga-Kr is evaluated by applying the Gaussian-3 and Gaussian-4 composite methods to the set of 19 atomisation energies, 15 ionisation energies, 4 electron affinities and 2 proton affinities for atoms and molecules containing these elements. The standard 6-31G basis set with additional diffuse and polarisation functions is replaced by the modified basis set. Results are compared for the calculated geometries and energy values against experimental values, the results using the standard 6-31G basis and other composite methods. The calculated geometries are improved in the Gaussian-3 composite method where MP2 is used to determine the geometries, but are slightly worse in the Gaussian-4 composite method where the density functional B3LYP method is used. The energy values with the new basis set have slightly higher errors against experiment for the Gaussian-3 approach, but the errors for the Gaussian-4 approach are essentially unchanged. If the new basis set is widely accepted after further studies, there appears to be no serious disadvantage in using it for these composite methods.
机译:通过将Gaussian-3和Gaussian-4复合方法应用于19个雾化能,15个电离能,4个电子亲和力和2个,对Ga-Kr元素的Mitin和Merz改进的6-31G *基组进行了评估。质子对包含这些元素的原子和分子的亲和力。带有附加漫反射和偏振功能的标准6-31G基础集被修改后的基础集取代。将计算出的几何形状和能量值与实验值进行比较,结果使用标准6-31G基础和其他复合方法进行比较。在使用MP2来确定几何形状的高斯3合成方法中,改进了计算的几何形状,但在使用密度泛函B3LYP方法的高斯4合成方法中,计算的几何形状稍差。新的基本集的能量值相对于高斯3方法的实验具有更高的误差,但高斯4方法的误差基本上没有变化。如果新的基础集在进一步研究后被广泛接受,则将其用于这些复合方法似乎没有严重的不利之处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号