首页> 外文期刊>Molecular pharmacology. >Ligand bias at metabotropic glutamate 1a receptors: Molecular determinants that distinguish β-arrestin-mediated from G protein-mediated signaling
【24h】

Ligand bias at metabotropic glutamate 1a receptors: Molecular determinants that distinguish β-arrestin-mediated from G protein-mediated signaling

机译:代谢型谷氨酸1a受体的配体偏向性:分子决定簇,可区分β-抑制蛋白介导的G蛋白介导的信号传导

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The metabotropic glutamate 1a (mGlu1a) receptor is a G protein-coupled receptor linked with phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis and with β-arrestin-1-mediated sustained extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) phosphorylation and cytoprotective signaling. Previously, we reported the existence of ligand bias at this receptor, inasmuch as glutamate induced both effects, whereas quisqualate induced only PI hydrolysis. In the current study, we showed that mGlu1 receptor agonists such as glutamate, aspartate, and L-cysteate were unbiased and activated both signaling pathways, whereas quisqualate and (S)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine stimulated only PI hydrolysis. Competitive antagonists inhibited only PI hydrolysis and not the β-arrestin-dependent pathway, whereas a noncompetitive mGlu1 receptor antagonist blocked both pathways. Mutational analysis of the ligand binding domain of the mGlu1a receptor revealed that Thr188 residues were essential for PI hydrolysis but not for protective signaling, whereas Arg323 and Lys409 residues were required for β-arrestin-1-mediated sustained ERK phosphorylation and cytoprotective signaling but not for PI hydrolysis. Therefore, the mechanism of ligand bias appears to involve different modes of agonist interactions with the receptor ligand binding domain. Although some mGlu1a receptor agonists are biased toward PI hydrolysis, we identified two endogenous compounds, glutaric acid and succinic acid, as new mGlu1 receptor agonists that are fully biased toward β-arrestin-mediated protective signaling. Pharmacological studies indicated that, in producing the two effects, glutamate interacted in two distinct ways with mGlu1 receptors, inasmuch as competitive mGlu1 receptor antagonists that blocked PI hydrolysis did not inhibit cytoprotective signaling. Quisqualate, which is biased toward PI hydrolysis, failed to inhibit glutamate-induced protection, and glutaric acid, which is biased toward protection, did not interfere with glutamate-induced PI hydrolysis. Taken together, these data indicate that ligand bias at mGlu1 receptors is attributable to different modes of receptor-glutamate interactions, which are differentially coupled to PI hydrolysis and β-arrestin-mediated cytoprotective signaling, and they reveal the existence of new endogenous agonists acting at mGlu1 receptors.
机译:代谢型谷氨酸1a(mGlu1a)受体是一种G蛋白偶联受体,与磷酸肌醇(PI)水解以及β-arrestin-1介导的持续性细胞外信号调节激酶(ERK)磷酸化和细胞保护信号有关。以前,我们报道了在该受体上存在配体偏倚,因为谷氨酸诱导了两种作用,而喹喹啉只诱导了PI水解。在当前的研究中,我们表明mGlu1受体激动剂(如谷氨酸,天冬氨酸和L-半胱氨酸)是无偏性的,并激活了两种信号传导途径,而喹喹啉和(S)-3,5-二羟基苯基甘氨酸仅刺激PI水解。竞争性拮抗剂仅抑制PI水解,而不抑制β-arrestin依赖性途径,而非竞争性mGlu1受体拮抗剂则阻断这两种途径。对mGlu1a受体配体结合结构域的突变分析显示,Thr188残基对于PI水解是必需的,但对于保护性信号却不是,而Arg323和Lys409残基对于β-arrestin-1介导的持续ERK磷酸化和细胞保护性信号是必需的,但对于PI水解。因此,配体偏倚的机制似乎涉及与受体配体结合域的激动剂相互作用的不同模式。尽管某些mGlu1a受体激动剂偏向PI水解,但我们确定了两种内源性化合物戊二酸和琥珀酸,作为完全偏向β-arrestin介导的保护性信号传导的新mGlu1受体激动剂。药理研究表明,在产生两种作用时,谷氨酸与mGlu1受体以两种不同的方式相互作用,因为阻断PI水解的竞争性mGlu1受体拮抗剂不能抑制细胞保护性信号传导。偏向PI水解的喹草酸盐不能抑制谷氨酸诱导的保护,偏向保护的戊二酸不干扰谷氨酸诱导的PI水解。综上所述,这些数据表明,mGlu1受体的配体偏倚可归因于受体-谷氨酸相互作用的不同模式,这些模式与PI水解和β-arrestin介导的细胞保护信号不同偶联,并且它们揭示了新的内源性激动剂在mGlu1受体。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号