首页> 外文期刊>Berichte uber Landwirtschaft >I Buy, Therefore I Want? - An interdisciplinary analysis of the consumer decision to buy or not to buy food commodities that are produced in a particularly environment- and animal-friendly way [German]
【24h】

I Buy, Therefore I Want? - An interdisciplinary analysis of the consumer decision to buy or not to buy food commodities that are produced in a particularly environment- and animal-friendly way [German]

机译:我买,所以我要吗? -对消费者购买或不购买以特别对环境和动物友好的方式生产的食品的决定的跨学科分析[德国]

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This paper challenges the following argument that has been launched in the current debate on agricultural policy change in Germany: The low demand for environment- and animal-friendly produced food in Germany shows that the consumers do not want these products. Therefore, the argument holds, political measures to promote the production of such commodities or to increase standards of environmental and animal protection are not justified. Based on theoretical considerations and empirical evidence in the literature, we maintain that-contrary to this argument-the purchasing behaviour of consumers does not necessarily reflect the level of environmental and animal protection they prefer. Combining economic and sociological concepts, we develop a model which identifies the factors that influence the consumer's decision to the disadvantage of environmental- and animal-friendly produced food commodities. The model distinguishes between characteristics of the food products on the one hand, and the decision behaviour of the consumer on the other. Concerning product characteristics, we discuss the following factors: price distortions (due to external effects and differences in market margins, and know-how), and problems concerning the availability, advertising and labelling of environmental- and animal-friendly products. With regard to the decision-behaviour of the consumers, the paper deals with the following issues: (a) in the case of conscious decision-making: trust, information costs, logistical problems, and a social dilemma; (b) in the case of unconscious decision-making: social context, habits, and repression. We then deal with the question, which of these factors that influence consumer decision to the disadvantage of environmental- and animal-friendly food products could justify political intervention. As possible political measures, the paper discusses the internalisation of external effects, the improvement of market transparency, and the implementation of animal protection standards.
机译:本文对当前在德国农业政策变化辩论中提出的以下论点提出了质疑:德国对环境和动物友好的生产食品的需求低表明消费者不想要这些产品。因此,该论点认为,采取政治措施来促进此类商品的生产或提高环境和动物保护标准是不合理的。基于理论上的考虑和文献中的经验证据,我们认为与该论证相反的是,消费者的购买行为并不一定反映他们所喜欢的环境和动物保护水平。结合经济和社会学概念,我们开发了一个模型,该模型确定了影响消费者决定的不利于环境和动物友好型生产食品的因素。该模型一方面区分食品的特性,另一方面区分消费者的决策行为。关于产品特性,我们讨论以下因素:价格扭曲(由于外部影响以及市场利润率和专有技术的差异),以及有关环境友好和动物友好型产品的可用性,广告和标签方面的问题。关于消费者的决策行为,本文涉及以下问题:(a)在有意识的决策中:信任,信息成本,后勤问题和社会困境; (b)在无意识的决策中:社会背景,习惯和压抑。然后,我们处理一个问题,哪些因素会影响消费者对环境和动物友好型食品的不利决定,从而可以证明政治干预是合理的。作为可能的政治措施,本文讨论了外部影响的内在化,市场透明度的提高以及动物保护标准的实施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号