...
首页> 外文期刊>Molecular ecology resources >Trace DNA from insect skins: a comparison of five extraction protocols and direct PCR on chironomid pupal exuviae
【24h】

Trace DNA from insect skins: a comparison of five extraction protocols and direct PCR on chironomid pupal exuviae

机译:昆虫皮肤中的痕量DNA:比较五种提取方法和直接PCR对chi虫双足虫的作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Insect skins (exuviae) are of extracellular origin and shed during moulting. The skins do not contain cells or DNA themselves, but epithelial cells and other cell-based structures might accidentally attach as they are shed. This source of trace DNA can be sufficient for PCR amplification and sequencing of target genes and aid in species identification through DNA barcoding or association of unknown life stages. Species identification is essential for biomonitoring programs, as species vary in sensitivities to environmental factors. However, it requires a DNA isolation protocol that optimizes the output of target DNA. Here, we compare the relative effectiveness of five different DNA extraction protocols and direct PCR in isolation of DNA from chironomid pupal exuviae. Chironomidae (Diptera) is a species-rich group of aquatic macroinvertebrates widely distributed in freshwater environments and considered a valuable bioindicator of water quality. Genomic DNA was extracted from 61.2% of 570 sampled pupal exuviae. There were significant differences in the methods with regard to cost, handling time, DNA quantity, PCR success, sequence success and the ability to sequence target taxa. The NucleoSpin (R) Tissue XS Kit, DNeasy (R) Blood and Tissue kit, and QuickExtract (TM) DNA Extraction Solution provided the best results in isolating DNA from single pupal exuviae. Direct PCR and DTAB/CTAB methods gave poor results. While the observed differences in DNA isolation methods on trace DNA will be relevant to research that focuses on aquatic macroinvertebrate ecology, taxonomy and systematics, they should also be of interest for studies using environmental barcoding and metabarcoding of aquatic environments.
机译:昆虫的皮肤(exuviae)是细胞外起源的,在换羽时脱落。皮肤本身不包含细胞或DNA,但是上皮细胞和其他基于细胞的结构在脱落时可能会意外附着。痕量DNA的来源可能足以对目标基因进行PCR扩增和测序,并通过DNA条形码或未知生命阶段的关联来辅助物种鉴定。物种识别对于生物监测计划至关重要,因为物种对环境因素的敏感性各不相同。但是,它需要优化目标DNA输出的DNA分离方案。在这里,我们比较了五种不同的DNA提取方案和直接PCR分离从尺ron ex DNA的相对有效性。 Chironomidae(Diptera)是一种物种丰富的水生无脊椎动物,广泛分布在淡水环境中,被认为是水质的重要生物指标。从570个样本中的u虫中提取61.2%的基因组DNA。这些方法在成本,处理时间,DNA数量,PCR成功率,序列成功率和目标靶群分类能力方面存在显着差异。 NucleoSpin(R)组织XS试剂盒,DNeasy(R)血液和组织试剂盒以及QuickExtract(TM)DNA提取液在从单个p状脓疱中分离DNA方面提供了最佳结果。直接PCR和DTAB / CTAB方法的结果较差。虽然在痕量DNA上DNA分离方法中观察到的差异将与侧重于水生无脊椎动物生态学,分类学和系统学的研究有关,但它们对于使用水生环境的环境条形码和元条形码的研究也应引起关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号