...
首页> 外文期刊>Molecular ecology resources >Improving PCR detection of prey in molecular diet studies: Importance of group-specific primer set selection and extraction protocol performances
【24h】

Improving PCR detection of prey in molecular diet studies: Importance of group-specific primer set selection and extraction protocol performances

机译:在分子饮食研究中提高对猎物的PCR检测:特定组引物选择和提取方案性能的重要性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

While the morphological identification of prey remains in predators' faeces is the most commonly used method to study trophic interactions, many studies indicate that this method does not detect all consumed prey. Polymerase chain reaction-based methods are increasingly used to detect prey DNA in the predator food bolus and have proven efficient, delivering highly accurate results. When studying complex diet samples, the extraction of total DNA is a critical step, as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) inhibitors may be co-extracted. Another critical step involves a careful selection of suitable group-specific primer sets that should only amplify DNA from the targeted prey taxon. In this study, the food boluses of five Rattus rattus and seven Rattus exulans were analysed using both morphological and molecular methods. We tested a panel of 31 PCR primer pairs targeting bird, invertebrate and plant sequences; four of them were selected to be used as group-specific primer pairs in PCR protocols. The performances of four DNA extraction protocols (QIAamp~? DNA stool mini kit, DNeasy~? mericon food kit and two of cetyltrimethylammonium bromide-based methods) were compared using four variables: DNA concentration, A_(260)/A_(280) absorbance ratio, food compartment analysed (stomach or faecal contents) and total number of prey-specific PCR amplification per sample. Our results clearly indicate that the A_(260)/A_(280) absorbance ratio, which varies between extraction protocols, is positively correlated to the number of PCR amplifications of each prey taxon. We recommend using the DNeasy~? mericon food kit (QIAGEN), which yielded results very similar to those achieved with the morphological approach.
机译:捕食者粪便中残留的猎物形态学识别是研究营养相互作用的最常用方法,但许多研究表明,这种方法不能检测出所有消耗的猎物。基于聚合酶链反应的方法越来越多地用于检测捕食者食物团中的猎物DNA,并且已被证明是有效的,可提供高度准确的结果。当研究复杂的饮食样品时,总DNA的提取是关键步骤,因为可能会共提取聚合酶链反应(PCR)抑制剂。另一个关键步骤涉及仔细选择合适的组特异性引物,该引物应仅扩增目标猎物分类中的DNA。在这项研究中,使用形态学和分子学方法分析了五只褐家鼠和七只褐家鼠的食物团。我们测试了一组31种针对鸟类,无脊椎动物和植物序列的PCR引物对;选择其中四个作为PCR方案中的组特异性引物对。使用四个变量比较了四种DNA提取方案(QIAamp〜?DNA粪便迷你试剂盒,DNeasy〜?mericon食品试剂盒和两种十六烷基三甲基溴化铵方法)的性能:DNA浓度,A_(260)/ A_(280)吸光度比率,所分析的食物室(胃或粪便含量)以及每个样品的特定于猎物的PCR扩增总数。我们的结果清楚地表明,在提取规程之间变化的A_(260)/ A_(280)吸光度比与每个捕食类群的PCR扩增数呈正相关。我们建议使用DNeasy〜? mericon食品套件(QIAGEN),其产生的结果与使用形态学方法获得的结果非常相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号