...
首页> 外文期刊>Molecular ecology >Stocking impact and migration pattern in an anadromous brown trout (Salmo trutta) complex: where have all the stocked spawning sea trout gone?
【24h】

Stocking impact and migration pattern in an anadromous brown trout (Salmo trutta) complex: where have all the stocked spawning sea trout gone?

机译:浮游鳟鱼中的放养影响和迁移方式:放养的所有产卵海鳟都去哪儿了?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

We examined polymorphism at seven microsatellite loci among sea trout (Salmo trutta) (n = 846) collected from three areas in the Limfjord (Denmark). We then assessed their potential population source by comparing, using a mixed stock analysis (MSA) Bayesian framework, their genetic composition to that of brown trout collected from 32 tributaries pooled into nine geographical regions (n = 3801) and two hatcheries (n = 222) used for stocking. For each of the three regional sea trout groups (western, central and eastern Limfjord, n = 91, n = 426, n = 329, respectively), MSA was conducted with (i) all individuals in the group, (ii) with the subset of spawning sea trout only and (iii) with the subset of foraging, nonspawning individuals only, a subset that consisted primarily of sea trout caught during their first year at sea. For all three regional sea trout groups, a higher proportion of individuals (regardless of whether they were foraging or spawning) appear to have originated from the rivers that drain locally, than from the rivers that drain in other parts of the Limfjord. This suggests (1) that sea trout, at least during their first year at sea, undertake limited migrations within the Limfjord system and (2) that sea trout on their spawning run were caught close to their natal rivers. The proportion of sea trout of hatchery origin varied widely among all three Limfjord areas and broadly reflected regional stocking histories, with high proportions of sea trout of domestic origin in the east (39.3%), where stocking with domestic trout was practised intensely at the time of sampling, and in the west (57.2%), where a programme of coastal stocking of post smolts took place over several years in the early 1990s. In contrast, in the central Limfjord, where stocking with domestic trout was largely abandoned in the early 1990s, the proportion of sea trout of domestic origin was only 8.5%. Interestingly, for all three regional sea trout groups, virtually no sea trout of hatchery origin were found among the spawning individuals, which were on average larger than the nonspawning sea trout. These results suggest that stocked domestic brown trout that become anadromous experience high mortality at sea and are therefore largely absent among the larger, spawning individuals. We conclude that sea trout of domestic origin exhibit much reduced ability to reproduce and are unlikely to contribute significantly to the local gene pool largely because of a relatively high mortality at sea before the onset of maturity.
机译:我们检查了从Limfjord(丹麦)三个地区收集的海鳟(Salmo trutta)(n = 846)中七个微卫星基因座的多态性。然后,我们通过使用混合种群分析(MSA)贝叶斯框架,将它们的遗传组成与从9个地理区域(n = 3801)和两个孵化场(n = 222)中收集的32条支流收集的褐鳟的遗传组成进行比较,从而评估了它们的潜在种群来源。 )用于放养。对于三个区域性海鳟鱼群(分别为Limfjord的西部,中部和东部,n = 91,n = 426,n = 329),MSA与(i)该组中的所有个体进行,(ii)与(iii)仅是产卵海鳟的子集,以及(iii)仅是非产卵个体的觅食子集,该子集主要由第一年在海上捕捞的海鳟组成。对于所有三个区域性海鳟种群而言,似乎比来自林峡湾其他地区的河流排放的个体(无论是觅食还是产卵)的比例更高(无论他们是觅食还是产卵)。这表明(1)至少在海上的第一年,海鳟在Limfjord系统内进行的迁移有限;(2)产卵期的海鳟被捕到靠近其出生河的地方。孵化场出产的海鳟的比例在三个林弗峡湾地区之间差异很大,并广泛反映了区域放养的历史,在东部,国内出产的海鳟比例很高(占39.3%),当时国内大量进行了鳟鱼的放养在西部(57.2%),在1990年代初的几年里,在沿海地区养了一个后熏鲑。相比之下,在1990年代初期,林法峡湾中部的国内鳟鱼种群被大量抛弃的情况下,国内鳟鱼的比例仅为8.5%。有趣的是,在所有三个区域性海鳟种群中,在产卵个体中几乎没有发现孵化场起源的海鳟,它们平均比非产卵海鳟大。这些结果表明,成年的家养鳟鱼在海上经历高死亡率,因此在较大的产卵个体中基本不存在。我们得出的结论是,国内海鳟的繁殖能力大大降低,并且不太可能对当地基因库做出重大贡献,这主要是因为成熟之前海中的死亡率较高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号