...
首页> 外文期刊>Measurement Science & Technology >Submicrometre-pitch intercomparison between optical diffraction, scanning electron microscope and atomic force microscope
【24h】

Submicrometre-pitch intercomparison between optical diffraction, scanning electron microscope and atomic force microscope

机译:光学衍射,扫描电子显微镜和原子力显微镜之间的亚微米间距比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Intercomparison of pitch measurements for one-dimensional-grating standards (240 nm pitch), one of the widely used reference standards for nanometric lateral scales, was performed by three different methods, optical diffraction, critical dimension scanning electron microscopy and nanometrological atomic force microscopy. Average pitch values obtained by the three methods deviated by a maximum of only 0.67 nm with expanded uncertainties (k=2) of less than 1.2 nm. The calculated E_(n) number, the index of measurement quality, of less than 1 indicates consistency of the measured pitch values and subsequent uncertainty analyses performed by three methods.
机译:通过光学衍射,临界尺寸扫描电子显微镜和纳米计量原子力显微镜这三种不同的方法,对一维光栅标准品(240 nm间距)(一种广泛使用的纳米级横向参考标准品)的间距测量进行了比对。通过三种方法获得的平均间距值最大偏差仅为0.67 nm,而不确定度(k = 2)小于1.2 nm。所计算的E_(n)数(测量质量的指标)小于1表示所测量的音高值的一致性以及随后通过三种方法进行的不确定性分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号