...
【24h】

Energise or De-energise to trip?

机译:通电或断电跳闸?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

"De-energise to trip" is a long established principle because of the danger of common cause failures. Although there is little published on this topic, it is covered in the section "Protection systems (trips and interlocks)" in the HSE Technical Measure Document for COMAH sites, but the quality of UPS, diagnostics etc. is now very different from the last century. As well as the obvious effects of architecture, failure modes and frequency on the number of spurious trips and failures to dangers, we have also studied the relationships between design policies, (for example, overrides and diagnostic coverage), testing policies, repair policies, operating policies and their effects on common cause failures. The effects of different policies on spurious trips and failures to danger would be illustrated with practical examples from the energy industry: oil and gas production and power stations.
机译:由于常见原因故障的危险,“断电脱扣”是一项长期存在的原则。尽管有关该主题的出版物很少,但有关COMAH站点的HSE技术措施文档中的“保护系统(跳闸和互锁)”部分对此进行了介绍,但是UPS,诊断程序等的质量与上一版大不相同。世纪。除了架构,故障模式和频率对虚假跳闸和故障失败次数的明显影响外,我们还研究了设计策略(例如,覆盖和诊断范围),测试策略,维修策略,操作策略及其对常见原因失败的影响。能源行业的实际例子将说明不同政策对虚假旅行和危险失败的影响:油气生产和发电站。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号