首页> 外文期刊>Measurement Science & Technology >Comparison of different methods for the determination of dynamic characteristics of low velocity thermal anemometers
【24h】

Comparison of different methods for the determination of dynamic characteristics of low velocity thermal anemometers

机译:确定低速热风速计动态特性的不同方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Three methods for determining the dynamic characteristics of low velocity thermal anemometers were compared. They were: step-up velocity change and step-down velocity change methods and a method based on sinusoidal-type velocity fluctuations. Two low velocity thermal anemometers with omnidirectional velocity sensors were tested. The results identify differences in the frequency response of low velocity anemometers determined by the three methods. The time constant and the response time determined by the step-up velocity change method and the step-down velocity change method may be substantially different and insufficient for describing the frequency response of all low velocity thermal anemometers. Therefore the upper frequency, determined in tests with sinusoidal velocity fluctuations, is recommended to be used in indoor climate standards as a single parameter describing the dynamic characteristics of low velocity thermal anemometers. A method for improvement of the frequency response of low velocity anemometers is suggested and validated.
机译:比较了确定低速热风速计动态特性的三种方法。它们是:升速变化和降速变化方法以及基于正弦型速度波动的方法。测试了两个带有全向速度传感器的低速热风速计。结果确定了由三种方法确定的低速风速计的频率响应差异。由升速变化方法和降速变化方法确定的时间常数和响应时间可能实质上不同并且不足以描述所有低速热风速计的频率响应。因此,建议将在正弦速度波动测试中确定的最高频率用作室内气候标准,作为描述低速热风速计动态特性的单个参数。提出并验证了一种改善低速风速计频率响应的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号