...
首页> 外文期刊>Mealey s Litigation Report: Lead >Pennsylvania High Court: PHA's Immunity Claim 'Improvidently Granted'
【24h】

Pennsylvania High Court: PHA's Immunity Claim 'Improvidently Granted'

机译:宾夕法尼亚高等法院:PHA的豁免声明“被无理授予”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, and PHA appealed to the Commonwealth Court. The Commonwealth Court partially affirmed, partially reversed the trial court's judgment, holding that PHA was negligent but ruling that there was no warranty of habitability in urban residences in the private sector. The Commonwealth Court alse said that because the PHA is a local agency, not a commonwealth agency, Ford's claim was not barred by the requirement of 42 Pennsylvania Code Section 5522(a) that notice of the claim be given within six months of the injury (notice requirement statute). The PHA appealed the Commonwealth Court's notice requirement statute decision to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
机译:初审法院判决原告胜诉,PHA向英联邦法院提起上诉。英联邦法院部分确认,部分推翻了原审法院的判决,认为PHA疏忽大意,但裁定不能保证私人部门中城市住宅的可居住性。英联邦法院还说,由于PHA是地方机构,而不是英联邦机构,因此,福特汽车的要求不受《宾夕法尼亚州法典》第42条第5522(a)条要求的规定,即在受伤后六个月内发出要求通知书(通知要求法规)。 PHA向联邦最高法院就英联邦法院的通知要求法规裁决提出上诉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号