首页> 外文期刊>Measurement >Derivation and comparison of fundamental uncertainty limits for laser-two-focus velocimetry, laser Doppler anemometry and Doppler global velocimetry
【24h】

Derivation and comparison of fundamental uncertainty limits for laser-two-focus velocimetry, laser Doppler anemometry and Doppler global velocimetry

机译:激光两焦点测速仪,激光多普勒风速仪和多普勒整体测速仪的基本不确定度限值的推导和比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Laser-2-focus velocimetry (L2F), laser Doppler anemometry (LDA) and Doppler global velocimetry (DGV) are common measurement techniques for flow analysis, but a fundamental comparison of their minimum achievable measurement uncertainties is still missing. In order to reveal the measurement principle with the lowest uncertainty, the Cramer-Rao lower bounds (CRLB) are derived analytically regarding two inevitable fundamental disturbances: photon shot noise and thermal detector noise. The CRLB results are compared with each other assuming equal temporal resolutions. For both noise sources, a relative uncertainty limit results for L2F and LDA, and an absolute uncertainty limit for DGV. Hence, DGV seems to be appropriate for investigating high-speed flows. However, the threshold velocities strongly depend on the possible viewing angles. The CRLBs are calculated and compared with each other for typical conditions in turbomachinery as an example.
机译:Laser-2-focus测速仪(L2F),激光多普勒风速仪(LDA)和多普勒整体测速仪(DGV)是用于流量分析的常用测量技术,但仍缺少对其可实现的最小测量不确定度的基本比较。为了揭示具有最低不确定性的测量原理,对两个不可避免的基本干扰:光子散粒噪声和热探测器噪声进行了分析,得出了Cramer-Rao下界(CRLB)。假设时间分辨率相等,则将CRLB结果彼此进行比较。对于这两种噪声源,L2F和LDA的相对不确定性极限,而DGV的绝对不确定性极限。因此,DGV似乎适合研究高速流量。但是,阈值速度很大程度上取决于可能的视角。以涡轮机械的典型条件为例,计算CRLB并相互比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号