首页> 外文期刊>Mechanics research communications >Parametric study of an elliptical fuselage made of a sandwich composite structure
【24h】

Parametric study of an elliptical fuselage made of a sandwich composite structure

机译:三明治复合结构制成的椭圆形机身的参数研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

We size the shell thickness of a pressurised elliptical fuselage and analyse the weight gains or savings compared to a circular fuselage. Three fuselage construction cases are analysed: a monolithic construction, a symmetric sandwich with two facesheets of equal thicknesses separated by a lightweight core, and an unsymmetric sandwich with two facesheets of different thicknesses. We develop a proper dimensionless analysis comparing the proposed elliptical fuselage with a circular one for two different scenarios: equivalent cross-section areas and enclosing a similar rectangular box. We apply a semi-analytical thin shell theory to compute the loading due to pressurisation around the circumference of the fuselage cross-section. We select the facesheet thicknesses above and below the sandwich core at every location to minimise weight. The goal is to compute the structural weight gain or penalty that is incurred by replacing a circular fuselage with an elliptical one to resist internal pressurisation in function of the scenario, eccentricity, fuselage diameter, and sandwich core thickness. We find that an elliptical cross-section incurs a significant penalty in terms of necessary facesheet thickness even with an optimised unsymmetric sandwich construction. This penalty can be minimised by keeping the eccentricity low, the loading intensity low and the core thick. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:我们确定了加压椭圆形机身的壳体厚度,并分析了与圆形机身相比增加或减少的重量。分析了三种机身构造案例:整体构造,具有两个相同厚度的面板(由轻型芯隔开)的对称夹心结构和具有两个不同厚度的面板的非对称夹心结构。我们开发了一种适当的无量纲分析,将拟议的椭圆形机身与圆形机身在两种不同情况下进行了比较:相等的横截面面积和类似的矩形框。我们应用半解析薄壳理论来计算由于机身横截面周围的压力所引起的载荷。我们在每个位置选择夹芯上方和下方的面板厚度,以最大程度地减轻重量。目的是计算结构重量增加或损失,该损失是通过将圆形机身替换为椭圆形机身来抵抗场景,偏心率,机身直径和夹芯厚度的函数而产生的内部压力。我们发现,即使采用优化的非对称夹心结构,椭圆形横截面也会在必要的面板厚度方面造成重大损失。通过保持较低的偏心率,较低的负载强度和较厚的磁芯,可以使这种损失最小化。 (C)2015 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号