...
首页> 外文期刊>Molecular & cellular proteomics: MCP >Coomassie blue as a near-Infrared fluorescent stain: A systematic comparison with sypro ruby for in-Gel protein detection
【24h】

Coomassie blue as a near-Infrared fluorescent stain: A systematic comparison with sypro ruby for in-Gel protein detection

机译:考马斯亮蓝作为近红外荧光染料:与sypro红宝石的凝胶内蛋白检测系统比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Quantitative proteome analyses suggest that the wellestablished stain colloidal Coomassie Blue, when used as an infrared dye, may provide sensitive, post-electrophoretic in-gel protein detection that can rival even Sypro Ruby. Considering the central role of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis in top-down proteomic analyses, a more cost effective alternative such as Coomassie Blue could prove an important tool in ongoing refinements of this important analytical technique. To date, no systematic characterization of Coomassie Blue infrared fluorescence detection relative to detection with SR has been reported. Here, seven commercial Coomassie stain reagents and seven stain formulations described in the literature were systematically compared. The selectivity, threshold sensitivity, inter-protein variability, and linear-dynamic range of Coomassie Blue infrared fluorescence detection were assessed in parallel with Sypro Ruby. Notably, several of the Coomassie stain formulations provided infrared fluorescence detection sensitivity to <1 ng of protein in-gel, slightly exceeding the performance of Sypro Ruby. The linear dynamic range of Coomassie Blue infrared fluorescence detection was found to significantly exceed that ofSypro Ruby. However, in two-dimensional gel analyses, because of a blunted fluorescence response, Sypro Ruby was able to detect a few additional protein spots, amounting to 0.6% of the detected proteome. Thus, althoughboth detection methods have their advantages and disadvantages, differences between the two appear to be small. Coomassie Blue infrared fluorescence detection is thus a viable alternative for gel-based proteomics, offering detection comparable to Sypro Ruby, and more reliable quantitative assessments, but at a fraction of the cost.
机译:定量蛋白质组分析表明,成熟的染色胶体考马斯蓝用作红外染料时,可提供灵敏的电泳后凝胶内蛋白检测,甚至可以与Sypro Ruby媲美。考虑到二维凝胶电泳在自上而下的蛋白质组学分析中的核心作用,更具成本效益的替代方法(例如考马斯亮蓝)可以证明是对该重要分析技术进行不断完善的重要工具。迄今为止,还没有关于考马斯蓝红外荧光检测相对于SR检测的系统表征的报道。在此,系统地比较了文献中描述的七种市售考马斯染色剂和七种染色剂配方。与Sypro Ruby并行评估了考马斯蓝红外荧光检测的选择性,阈值灵敏度,蛋白间变异性和线性动态范围。值得注意的是,几种考马斯亮色配方提供了对<1 ng凝胶中蛋白质的红外荧光检测灵敏度,略高于Sypro Ruby的性能。发现考马斯蓝红外荧光检测的线性动态范围大大超过了Sypro Ruby。但是,在二维凝胶分析中,由于钝化的荧光响应,Sypro Ruby能够检测到其他一些蛋白质斑点,占检测到的蛋白质组的0.6%。因此,尽管两种检测方法都有其优点和缺点,但两者之间的差异似乎很小。因此,考马斯亮蓝红外荧光检测是基于凝胶的蛋白质组学的可行替代方案,可提供与Sypro Ruby相当的检测,并提供更可靠的定量评估,但价格却低廉。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号